Vol-l ORCHIDACEAE 411 



53, 5U; Gedney in Floral World (1876) 323; Puydt Orch. (1880) 



307, t. SU; Burb. in The Garden 22 (1882) 118; Hemsl. Bot. Chal. 



Exped. 1 (1885) 199; Warner & Wijl. Orch. Alb. 6 (1887) t. 277; 



Rolfe in Gard. Chron. Ill 5 (1889) 88; Gower in The Garden 35 



(1889) 363; Rolfe in l'Orchidoph. 13 (1893) 100; Will. Orch. Grow. 



Man. ed. 7 (1894) 664. 

 Phalaenopsis aphrodite Lem. in 111. Hort. 10 (1863) Misc. 14, quoad 



citat. Rumph., non Reichb. f. 

 Phalaenopsis amabilis Blume var. grandiflora Batem. Second Cent. 



Orch. PI. (1867) t. 1U. 

 Phalaenopsis amabilis Blume var. rimestadtiana L. Linden in Lindenia 



16 (1902) 35, t. 736; Edit, in Gard. Chron. Ill 32 (1902) 306, t.; 



Pauwels in Rev. Hort. Belg. 29 (1903) 88, figs. 22-2 U; Rolfe in 



Orch. Rev. 14 (1906) 233, fig. 27, 23 (1915) 254. 

 Phalaenopsis rimestadtiana "Argus" in Orch. Rev. 13 (1905) 260, 



in textu, nomen; Rolfe in Orch. Rev. 25 (1917) 151, in textu, 



nomen. 



Although the species proper does not occur in the Philippines, it has been 

 deemed advisable to cite a full synonynry and bibliography of it on 

 account of the confusion arising from the inclusion in it, by Lindley and 

 subsequently by others, of Philippine material. The species is represented 

 in the Philippines by variety aphrodite (Reichb. f.) Ames and its variations. 



Var. APHRODITE (Reichb. f.) Ames Orch. 2 (1908) 226, 5 (1915) 216. 



Phalaenopsis amabilis Lindl. in Bot. Reg. 24 (1838) t. 3U (excl. syn.) ; 

 Paxt. Mag. Bot. 5 (1838) 20, 162, 7 (1840) 49, text cut, t. (excl. 

 syn.); Maund Botanist 3 (1839?) t. 133 (excl. syn.); Lem. in Fl. 

 des Serres 1 (1845) 85, text cut, t. 36 (excl. syn.) ; Blanco Fl. 

 Filip. ed. 2 (1845) 592, ed. 3, 3 (1879) 41; Edit, in Allg. Berl. 

 Gartenz. 13 (1845) 389, 15 (1847) 215 (excl. syn. in both); Hook, 

 in Bot. Mag. 73 (1847) t. 4297 (excl. syn. in part); Blume 

 Rumphia 4 (1848) 52, quoad citat. Lindl.; Lindl. in Gard. Chron. 

 (1848) 39, fig. 2; Reichb. f. in Walp. Ann. 1 (1849) 790, 3 (1852) 

 561, quoad Philip.;, Moore 111. Orch. PI. (1857) Phalaenop. 6, 

 t. 1 (excl. syn.); Miq. Fl. Ind. Bat. 3 (1859) 690, quoad citat. 

 Bot. Mag. et quoad Philip.; Gedney in Floral World (1876) 

 323; Reichb. f. in Gard. Chron. II 5 (1876) 654; Burb. in The 

 Garden 22 (1882) 119; Naves Novis. App. (1882) 243;, Vidal 

 Phan. Cuming. Philip. (1885) 150, Rev. PI. Vase. Filip. (1886) 

 270; Linden & Rodigas in Lindenia 2 (1886) 65, t. 79 (excl. syn. 

 in parte) ; Gower in The Garden 35 (1889) 362, fig. 363; Roebelen 

 in Gard. Chron. Ill 7 (1890) 459, in textu; Will. Orch. Grow. Man. 

 ed. 7 (1894) 660, quoad bibliog. in parte et quoad Philip.; Merr. 

 in Govt. Lab. Publ. (Philip.) 8 (1903) 57, 174, 27 (1905) 84; 

 J. J. Sm. FL Buitenz. 6 (Orch. Jav.) (1905) 549, quoad bibliog. 

 in parte et quoad Philip.; Ames Orch. 1 (1905) 101, quoad spec, 

 (excl. syn. et descr.) ; Merr. Sp. Blancoanae (1918) 115, non Blume. 



Phalaenopsis aphrodite Reichb. f. in Hamb. Gartenz. 18 (1862) 35, 

 Xen. Orch. 2 (1862) 6; Duchartre in Journ. Soc. Imp. et Centr. 

 Hort. Par. 8 (1862) 730; Lem. in 111. Hort. 10 (1863) Misc. 14 

 (excl. citat. Rumph.); Rolfe in Gard. Chron, II 26 (1886) 212, 



