— t6.S — 



H. strigosa Walker. 



1SS5 — Wai.kkr, Cat. I'rit. Mas., pt. Ill, p. 615. 



laqueata Hy. Edwards. 



18S7— Hv. EnwAuns, Ent. Amer., \'ol. II, p. 166. 



Thorax l:)lack, inner half of patagia aild edge of collar [)ink 

 flesh color. .Abdomen deep red above with lateral black spots and 

 last segment black. Wings translucent, primaries blackish brown, 

 streaked with pale pink, in no definite markings, giving a longi- 

 tudinally strigose appearance. Secondaries colorless, with outt^r 

 brown bonier. Expanse, 45 mm. 



Habitat, Havli, Jamaica, Florida.* 



H. interlineata Walker. 



1855— Wai.kkk, Cat. Brit. Mus., \'o'. Ill, p. 739. 



j lie Hilda Herricli-SchJiffer. 



1S55 — HEUKicn-ScHAKi-FKii, Ausser. Schmeti., fig. 2S5. 



limtipcs Cjfote. 



1S65 — CiiOTE, Proc. Ent. Soc, Phil , \"oI. \', p. 242. 



1S90 — MoscHLKK, Abliand., .Senck., Ges., \ ol. X\'I, p. 115. 



diivisii Ily. Edwards. 



1S75 — Hy. Edwards, I'ioc. Cal. Acad. Sci., Vol. \', p. 365. 

 J)rownish ochraceous, marked as in tessellaris but the borders 

 of the catenulatc maculations very tlistinct, black, the basal 

 markings confluent with a triangular patch between vein i and 

 median. Abdomen dark ocherous above, patagia and collar 

 lined with sea-green. K.xpanse, 55 — 60 mm. 



Hal'itat. lirazil, Me.xico, Florida, Texas and Arizona. 



H. tessellaris Alil)ot <^ Smith. 



1797 — AiiBOi& Smiiii. I.ep. Ins., C.a., \'ol. II. p. 75. 



aiidplioln Walsh. 



1864— \Va LSI 1, I'roc. Bost. Soc, N. II., N'ol. IX. p. 2SS. 



fonn harrisii Walsh. 



1S64 — Watsu, I'roc. Ent. Soc, I'hil., \ CI. Ill, p. 430. 

 Pale straw yellow, the abdomen above buff, the patagia linetl 

 inwardly with green. Six bands of a darJ<er tint cross the fore 

 wings, the fourth not reaching below median vein. I'hese bands 

 are (piadrate-catenulate and neatlx' lined on each side with l)rown- 

 black. 'i'hey vary much in width, e\ami")Ies oc-curing in which 

 ihev are almost C(^mi")letely contluent. 



The form harrisii W alsh does not differ in markings. It is 

 considered to be a distinct species on account of larval differences 



* The moth described by Mr. l>dwards, was sent to him by Mr. JSruce, who 

 informs me that it came from Florida and not from Texas as mentioned by Mr. 

 l-Alwards. Ed.t. 



