li()8 JoUKN.M, Nl.W \'()KK lv\ rO.Mol.OClCAI, SoClKI'Y. [\'ol. X. 



lithmia texanella Chaiiil'. 

 /<]tliiiii(t (■liiunl>nsrl/ii 1)var. 



( ,'li;uiil)ors described Ancsycliia fc.\aiicl/a on page 179 of the Joiirii. 

 ( 'incimiati Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. II, and llypoiioniriifa Icxaiiclla on 

 page 180. Uolli species prove toH)el(Mig tQ I'llliiiiiii 'AWiX tlie latter is 

 ;i synonym of A', zrllfriclla^ leaving tln' former, earlier name valid. 

 In l)ull. 52, If. S. Nat. Miis., I wrongly (piotcd the later Awvc/zc/Aj' as 

 page 2 inslcad of i.So (an c-rror due to llu' use of the separately ])aged 

 copy insk-ad of the full volume and which escaped correction), which 

 caused me to proposi- a new name for the earlier tiwanclla su|)posing 

 il lobe later and inv.ilid. 1 have a single specimen, without label, 

 which I attribuU; to this species, but which may possibly not be the 

 same. If not, Ihe name (liaiiihcrsrlla can be used for it. It is white, 

 dusU-d with brown scales, which form a dot in the cell, one at end of 

 cell and a large one half way between these on the submedian fold ; 

 an indistinct submarginal powdering and terminal row of smalf dots. 

 I\\pansc, .'.{) nnn. ; one fcmak', in poor < ondition. U. S. Nat. Mus., 

 type No. <^)(^)25. 



A NEW YPONOMEUTA. 

 r.v IIakkison (1. Dyak. 

 Ypononicutii ;il<>m<>cell;i, sp. n<)\ . 



I'iil|ii wliilc, sccoiiil jiiiiil \vi(!i \i\m\ (lol. (liiid lihuk ; tlioiax wliilc, two l)lack 

 .^pots liclorc on disk and two Ixliitid. l''ore wiuj^ white vvitli many l)lai:k spots ai- 

 iiiii^jcd iirci^uliiriy in lour Km^itudinid rows, conl'iiscd beyond llic coll and with a 

 row of dots around tlic niarj^in ; IVinffo red-I>rown. llind winj^s and under side uni- 

 I'ornily red l)rown. lA't:;s wiiite, fore legs hnj^ely i)hick, middle tibi;v banded with 

 bhuk. Expanse, iS mm. 



Two specimens, one labelled " r,eHaron," the other '' Texas, 

 coll. J. H. .Smith." The fust specimen is also labelled by Kiley 

 ^^ J'sri(i<//(i (iti>iiios('lhi Kiley MS." and another slip written by /eller, 

 ( )ct()ber, I1S71, stating that the specimen is, in his opinion, not a 

 Hyf'oiioiiictita but -a PsccaJid ; but in this 1 cannot concur. I am 

 pleased, however, to adopt I )r. Riley's manuscript specilu" name. 

 U. S. Nat. Mus., ty|)e No. ()()i |. 



