Cuitton.—Additions to the New Zealand Crustacea. 171 
95. Diloma aethiops is not Monodonta reticularis of Gray; the latter 
ought to be replaced in catalogue, as I have both. 
96. Diloma gaimardi is same as D. sulcatus, Wood. 
96. Trochocochlea mimetica, Hutton, is M. reticularis, Gray. 
98. Zizyphinus granatus, Chemnitz, is not the same as Z. tigris, 
Martyn ; the granatus of Dunedin Museum is tigris. 
103. Margarita fulminata should be a Gibbula. 
Margarita, nov. sp.—Add to catalogue. Perhaps Gibbula incon- 
spicua of Hutton, p. 102. 
106. Emarginula candida, A. Adams—Add. 
Emarginula tenui-costata—Add. 
Tugalia ossea—Add. 
107. Tectura pileopsis—Add. 
Tectura fragilis—Add. 
110. Patella stellaris—Add. Like one named corticata in Dunedin 
Museum, but not quite. 
118. Lepidopleurus crocinus, Reeve—Add. This is probably L. 
empleurus, Button. 
118. Ischnochiton antiquus, Reeve—Add. 
121. Haminea zealandie and obesa are the same. 
136. Anatina tasmanica is A. angasii. 
143. Tellina disculus is not the same as sublenticularis of Sowerby. 
159. Cardita zealandica is the same as compressa of Reeve. 
167. Mytilus edulis is neither edulis nor dunkeri of Reeve. 
171. Pecten vellicatus, Hutton, is the same as converus, Q and G, 
and roseapunctatus, Reeve. 
Adamsia typica—Add. 
Arr, XXIV.—Additions to the New Zealand Crustacea. 
By Cuartes Camron, B.A. 
[Read before the Philosophical Institute of Canterbury, 13th October, 1881.] 
Plate VIII. 
Tas paper contains the descriptions of three new species of Crustacea, 
Wo belonging to the Brachyura and one to the Isopoda. I also describe 
mod Male of a species of Amphipoda, the female only having been hitherto 
wn 
