221 



Table 65. Post-treatment mite population means by strain (treatment 

 ignored) and by treatment group from the caged-layer trial 

 at Chipley, Fl . 



GROUP I NT. 



n 



e 



c 

 c 

 c 

 c 

 c 

 c 



D C 



D C 



D C 



3 C 



D C 



D C 



D C 



D C 



D C 

 Q 



-V; 3 



.'s 



STRAIN 



2979 . ^736 3 .4 



95 



I 2 



21 1 3.957395 



05 



D 



l~?3^. i ao 35 l 



94 



1 



945, 533333 



96 



3 



37 6. 32 Q7 ?7 



9 ■>■ 



1 1 



86 5.3354-17 



95 



-> 



63 3. 1 5^395 



95 



"7 



£6^.321 053 



c:, 5 



;a 



370 . 93 a 533 



96 



1 



36~«062 500 



O ^v 



5 



3 1 5.Z1 j 526 



9 3 



6 



1 .1^.945652 



92 



1 



GROUPING MEAN v l T ' 



A L 980. «• ^42 11 -5^0 2 



2. -.62711? 56 9 1 



a 



Means with the same letter are not significantly different 



(p < .05). 



Treatment 1 = Ravap , Treatment 2 = Control . 



