300 KOVITATES ZOOLOGICAB XXIII. 1916. 



Size = stomphax plateni, being smaller than p. phaon. 



Hab. Sumatra, 2 c? <$ (Felder coll.). 



Of menado Hew. I have 1 S from the Island of Siao which is nearest to 

 m. syllus Frühst, from Gangir, but smaller. I cannot, however, describe it from 

 one not very fresh specimen. 



XANTHOTAENIA 



I have no remarks to make except that I consider this genus ought to come 

 before instead of after Aemona, as Fruhstorfer has placed it. 



Xanthotaenia busiris batuensis subsp. nov. 



cT. Above considerably paler than b. busiris and much more cinnamon rufous. 

 Below it is even paler than b. polgchroma Hag. 

 Hab. Batu Island, 2 <S<5, 1896-97 (H. Raap). 



AEMONA 



I only have a new subspecies to describe. 



Aemona amathusia tonkinensis subsp. nov. 



<$. Differs from a. amathusia above in having a more rufous less greyish wash, 

 and in the postmedian bands of the fore wings being more developed, also on the 

 hindwing the zigzag band basad of the postmedian line is much more pronounced 

 and rufous brown. Below the difference is almost nil. 



Hab. Tonkin, 2 $S, Yubay. 



HYANTIS 



Here I can only remark that my //. albiplaga, must be reduced to a subspecies. 

 It shows the same light and dark variation that is found throughout the range of 

 the single species hodeva Hew. The much more abundant light phase must bear 

 the name : 



Hyantis hodeva albiplaga ab. pallida ab. nov. 



Both h. albiplaga and the ab. pallida differ from k. Julic/inosa G. Smith and 

 its ab. oxijophthalma Stich, in the ocellus on the hindwing above being much more 

 flat and less defined in addition to other differences. //. h. albip>laga is from the 

 Snow Mountains, while h.fidiginosa is from Kapaur. 



Morphopsis 



(PI. IV. ff. 1-4) 



Here we find some interesting problems. Hitherto, owing to the scarcity of 

 this genus in collections, two totally different species have been confused under the 

 name M. albertisi Obertli. Even Herr Frnhstorfer in Seitz failed to perceive this 

 fact. The error arose because Mr. Henley Grose Smith, when he worked out 

 Doherty's collections from Biak and Humboldt Bay, had, like most of us, never 

 seen a 3 of true albertisi. The second species remained in collections as the <$ of 



