PRODUCTION OP MILK OF LOW BACTEEIAL CONTENT. 



17 



^ £ 'J? 6 * k ^ s ^ * * ^ ^ ^ 



I § § § » s & 



/V<5?/ 

 2 



o" 

 <z 



^ _ 

 & 



& 



/O 



// 

 /2 

 A? 

 /■¥ 



SS^5i 





/& 

 /& 



so 



2/ 

 22 

 2& 



2>?- 



5ss 





™™ 



™a 



^ffTOrTH~ 



v^9 

 «*/ 



SO 



\ 



HH 



^^5s 



_■ 55 



":- HHs 



sss 



SHI 



^H!35 



SSS 



? ^T 



M SBB 



H5 



^wfi'Sg 



^H >-: ^5S ^^W S 



^5r 



.5??: 



WOT WT5WE3 



Ss: 



hb 



ssss sssn ess ssss 



sssssnsa 



a nsss ssss nsss ssss: 



HP 



SS3 



s\ss\ssss 



T^T^vrvrTrrvrT 



CTvrt crrrr rrrrr 



8 I 



Fig. 10. — Effect of washing the udder and teats on the bacterial content of milk. 

 18989°— 18— Bull, 642 3 



