PRODUCTION OF MILK OP LOW BACTERIAL CONTENT. 61 



been studied, nor has the influence of general conditions of cleanliness 

 surrounding the production of milk been given consideration. 



LITERATURE CITED. 



(1) Stocking, W. A., Jr. 



1906. Quality of milk affected by common dairy practices. Conn. 

 (Storrs) Agr. Exp. Sta. Bui. 42. 



(2) North, Charles E. 



1908. A method of milk production. In Med. Rec. [N. Y.], v. 73, no. 7, 



p. 263-266. 

 1917. A survey of dairy score cards. In Amer. Jour. Pub. Health, v. 7, 



no. 1, p. 25-39. 



(3) Prtjcha, M. J., Harding, H. A, and Weeter, H. M. 



1915. Utensils as a source of bacterial contamination of milk. In 

 Science, N. S., v. 42, no. 1080, p. 353. 



(4) SCHROEDER, E. C. 



1910. The relation of the tuberculous cow to public health. In U. S. 

 Dept. Agr. Bur. Anim. Indus. 25th Ann. Rpt, 1908, p. 109-153. 

 (5) Stocking, W.A., Jr. 



1907. Comparative studies with covered milk pails. Conn. (Storrs) 

 Agr. Exp. Sta. Bui. 48. 



(6) Harding, H. A., Wilson, J. K., and Smith, G. A. 



1910. The modern milk pail. N. Y. (Geneva) Agr. Exp. Sta. Bui. 326. 



(7) Lamson, R. W. 



1914. Inexpensive aids in producing sanitary milk. Md. Agr. Exp. Sta. 

 Bui. 181. 



(8) Campbell, H. C. 



1916. Comparison of the bacterial count of milk with the sediment or 

 dirt test. U. S. Dept. Agr. Dept. Bui. 361. 



(9) Harding, H. A., Ruehle, G. L., Wilson, J. K., and Smith, G. A. 



1913. The effect of certain dairy operations upon the germ content of 

 milk. N. Y. (Geneva) Agr. Exp. Sta. Bui. 365. 

 (i0) Rtjehle, G. L. A, and Kulp, W. L. 



1915. Germ content of stable air and its effect upon the germ content 

 of milk. N. Y. (Geneva) Agr. Exp. Sta. Bui. 409. 



(11) Prucha, M. J., and Weeter, H. M. 



1917. Univ. of 111. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bui. 199. 



