18 



BULLETIN" 452, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 



Table 3. — Comparison of total sugar and acid results for all named varieties analyzed 

 during 1908-1911 and 1913, with acid-sugar ratios — Continued. 



Variety. 



Year. 



Num- 

 ber of 

 sam- 

 ples. 



Sugar as 

 invert. 



Acid as 

 tartaric. 



Concord 



Do 



Do 



Do 



Do 



Do 



Do 



Conqueror 



Corby 



Creveling 



Croton 



Cvnthiana 



Do 



Do 



Do 



Do 



Daisy 



Delago 



Delaware 



Do 



Do 



Do 



Do 



Do 



Do 



Do 



Do 



Do 



Do 



Do 



Diamond 



Do 



Diana 



Do 



Do 



Diogenes 



Dutchess 



Do 



Do 



Early Dawn 



Early Golden 



Eldorado 



Elvira 



Do 



Do 



Do 



Do 



Do 



Empire State 



Etta 



Eumelan 



Do 



Do 



Franken Riesling. 



Franklin 



Goethe 



Gofl 



Gold Dust 



Golden 



Glen'eld 



Green Early 



GutEdel 



Do 



Hayes 



Do 



Hartford 



Herbert 



Herbemont 



Hexamer 



Hicks 



Honey Dew 



Illinois City 



Iona 



Do 



Do 



1910 

 1910 

 1911 

 1911 

 1911 

 1913 

 1913 

 1913 

 1910 

 1910 

 1910 

 1909 

 1909 

 1910 

 1911 

 1913 

 1910 

 1910 

 1908 

 1909 

 1909 

 1909 

 1910 

 1910 

 1910 

 1911 

 1911 

 1911 

 1913 

 1913 

 1910 

 1913 

 1909 

 1910 

 1913 

 1913 

 1910 

 1913 

 1913 

 1910 

 1910 

 1910 

 1909 

 1909 

 1910 

 1910 

 1911 

 1913 

 1910 

 1909 

 1910 

 1910 

 1913 

 1911 

 1913 

 1913 

 1910 

 1910 

 1910 

 1910 

 1909 

 1909 

 1910 

 1909 

 1910 

 1910 

 1910 

 1913 

 1910 

 1910 

 1910 

 1910 

 1908 

 1!09 

 1910 



Other northern.. 



Virginia 



Northern Ohio.. 

 Other northern.. 



Virginia 



New York 



New Jersey 



....do...: 



New York 



do 



do 



Northern Ohio.. 



Virginia 



do 



do 



New Jersey 



New York 



....do*. 



Northern Ohio . - 



do 



Other northern. . 



Virginia 



Northern Ohio . . 

 Other northern.. 



Virginia 



Northern Ohio . . 



New York 



Virginia 



New York 



New Jersey 



New York 



New Jersey 



Northern Ohio.. 



All northern 



New York 



New Jersey 



New York 



do 



New Jersey 



New York 



do 



do 



Northern Ohio.. 



Virginia 



Northern Ohio . . 



New York 



Northern Ohio . . 



New York 



All northern 



Northern Ohio. 



do - 



New York 



New Jersey 



New York 



New Jersey 



do 



New York 



do 



do 



do 



Northern Ohio. 



do 



do 



....do 



do 



New York 



do 



New Jersey 



New York 



do 



do 



do 



Northern Ohio. 

 All northern . . . 

 Northern Ohio. 



16.45 

 16. 33. 

 17.87 

 16.93 

 18.11 

 17.49 

 14.08 

 12.98 

 13.77 

 13.93 

 11.84 

 19.10 

 19.75 

 21.10 

 21.23 

 19.24 

 16.95 

 17. 25 

 25. 24 

 21.08 

 19.86 

 22. 45 

 24.09 

 19.70 

 21. 00 

 24.37 



15. 06 



25. 80 

 22.00 

 22.39 

 16.52 

 17.48 

 19.90 

 20.27 

 18.80 

 14.23 

 17.48 

 18.02 

 16.78 

 16.22 

 18.50 

 19.63 

 14.29 



15. 35 

 17.16 

 14.23 

 13. 57 

 14.16 

 16.10 

 11.24 



13. 54 

 17.80 

 18.38 

 18.15 

 18.41 

 15. 12 

 15.64 

 15. 71 

 17.04 

 14.56 

 14.21 

 20. 20 



20. 36 

 H. 45 

 15. 16 



15. 81 



16. 54 



15. 55 

 16. 36 

 13. 32 

 Hi. 34 

 17.81 : 

 21.09 

 19.78 | 

 21.31 



0.888 

 .823 

 .525 

 .654 

 .530 

 .747 

 .732 



1.074 

 .938 



1.009 

 .788 



1.598 

 .986 



1.080 

 .767 



1.266 

 .653 



1.009 

 .467 



l .S09 

 .853 

 .702 

 .794 



1.001 

 .551 

 . 556 

 .916 

 .645 

 .943 

 .660 



1.058 

 .634 

 .950 

 .965 

 .986 



1. 599 

 .734 

 .704 

 .586 



1.065 

 .848 

 .784 



1.002 

 . 735 

 .913 



1.253 

 .750 



1.288 

 .704 



1.369 

 .930 

 .961 

 .706 



1.208 



1. 188 

 .SS8 



. v. ") 



.694 

 .420 



1.106 

 .758 



1.144 



1.350 

 .893 



1.118 

 .893 



1.200 

 .904 



1.245 



1. 159 

 .956 

 .998 

 . 679 

 .836 



1 Acid average of 17 samples. 



