BUD VARIATION IN THE WASHINGTON NAVEL ORANGE. 



31 



Table II. — Summarized statement of the average annual production of 151 Washington 

 Navel orange trees for which detailed -performance records were obtained for six years, 

 1910 to 1915, inclusive — Continued. 



Rank. 



59. 

 60. 

 61. 

 62. 

 63. 

 64. 

 65. 

 66. 

 67. 

 68. 

 69. 

 70. 

 71. 

 72. 

 73. 

 74. 

 75. 

 76. 

 77. 

 78. 

 79. 

 80. 

 81. 

 82. 

 83. 

 84. 

 85. 

 86. 

 87. 

 88. 

 89. 

 90. 

 91. 

 92. 

 93. 

 94. 

 95. 

 96. 

 97. 

 98. 

 99. 

 100 

 lni 

 102 

 103 

 104 

 105 



Tree desig- 

 nation. 



10:1-28- 3 



10:1-28-10 



4-21-31 



4-29- 6 



10:1-30- 1 



10:1-31- 1 



10:1-31- 2 



4-21-30 



*10:1-31- 9 



10:1-30- 8 



10:1-28- 2 



4-17-34 



10:1-32-11 



10:1-32- 5 



10:1-32- 8 



4-31- 2 



10:1-31- 3. 



10:1-31- 8 



3-14- 3 



*10:l-28- 1 



4-23-28 



10:1-31-11 



7:1-65-21 



10:1-32- 2 



6:1-70- 9 



10:1-28-11 



10:1-29- 5 



7:1-65-22 



4-30- 5 



*10:l-32- 1 



10:1-29- 1 



10:2- 7-13 



4- 3- 6 



10:1-30-4 



*10:l-29- 9 



4-31- 3 



10:1-30- 6 



4-17-16 



*4-18- 1 



:l-65- 8 



i : 1-28- 7 



: 1-6.5-10 



:l-69- 6 



: 1-65-13 



: 1-69-11 



>: 1-30-11 



: 1-69-13 



10: 



Annual crop production, 

 6-year average. 



Weight. 



Pounds. 

 229. 5 

 227.6 

 224. 6 

 224.0 

 223.9 

 223.8 

 223.3 

 222.9 

 220.7 

 218.7 

 218.3 

 217.5 

 217.4 

 216.1 

 215. 9 

 214.4 

 214.1 

 211.0 

 211.0 

 209. 5 

 209.4 

 208.3 

 207.6 

 207.1 

 205.6 

 204.4 

 202.4 

 201.9 

 201.3 

 201.2 

 197.0 

 195. 5 

 193. 

 192.7 

 188.0 

 187.3 

 186. 3 

 183.6 

 176.7 

 173.7 

 173.7 

 172.8 

 164.4 

 162.6 

 161. 3 

 153. 8 

 152.1 



Num- 

 ber. 



510 

 484 

 451 



480 

 435 

 454 

 468 

 460 

 451 

 433 

 449 

 454 

 438 

 433 

 434 

 451 

 465 

 479 

 548 

 425 

 476 

 458 

 430 

 560 

 393 

 435 

 427 

 419 

 344 

 388 

 379 

 402 

 369 

 348 

 316 

 468 

 339 

 431 

 450 

 442 

 442 

 344 

 405 



Or- 

 chard 



P.ct. 

 82.6 

 84.6 

 79.8 

 82.2 

 85.5 

 83.8 

 81.6 

 81.6 

 83.4 

 83.6 

 83.2 

 79.6 

 86.4 

 85.4, 

 83.6 

 78.6 

 85.0 

 83.8 

 85.6 

 82:0 

 79.6 

 82.6 

 80.0 

 83.0 

 86.0 

 85.2 

 85.2 

 80.4 

 80.6 

 82.2 

 83.6 



, 78.6 

 82.6 

 83.0 

 85.0 

 77.2 

 83.6 

 79.2 

 83.2 

 84.8 

 83.6 

 81.6 

 76.6 

 78.6 

 81.8 

 84.2 

 84.8 



Vari- 

 able 

 fruits. 



P.ct. 



0.72 

 .69 

 .52 



1.55 

 .37 

 .78 

 .61 

 .25 



1.26 



1.50 

 .43 

 .80 

 .84 

 .42 



2.52 

 .77 

 .80 

 .88 

 .85 



1.11 

 .86 



1.00 

 .55 

 .78 

 .21 



1.48 

 .47 

 .59 



1.27 

 .64 



1.36 

 .36 

 .44 

 .64 

 .40 



1.69 

 .81 

 .57 



1.17 

 .43 



1.71 



1.16 

 .40 

 .45 

 .52 



Rank. 



106.. 

 107.. 

 108.. 

 109.. 

 110.. 

 111.. 

 112.. 

 113.. 

 114.. 

 115.. 

 116.. 

 117.. 

 118. . 

 119.. 

 120.. 

 121.. 

 122.. 

 123.. 

 124.. 

 125.. 

 126.. 

 127.. 

 128.. 

 129.. 

 130. . 

 131.. 

 132.. 

 133.. 

 134.. 

 135. . 

 136.. 

 137.. 

 138.. 

 139.. 

 140.. 

 141.. 

 142.. 

 143.. 

 144.. 

 145.. 

 146.. 

 147.. 

 148.. 

 149.. 

 150.. 

 151.. 



Tree desig- 

 nation. 



69- 8 

 65- 6 

 66-11 

 69-12 



65- 7 

 65-15 

 65-14 



66- 9 

 66-13 

 65- 9 

 69-15 

 69-10 

 67-11 



-66-15 

 -66-14 

 -66-, 6 

 -69^4 

 -68-11 

 -69- 7 

 -67-14 

 -65-11 

 -69- 9 

 -66- 7 

 -67-10 

 -67-15 

 -68- 7 

 -66- 8 

 -65-12 

 -68-15 

 -68- 6 

 -68-13 

 -67-12 

 -68- 9 

 -67- 8 

 -67- 7 

 -68-10 

 -67- 9 

 -67- 6 

 -68-14 

 -68- 8 

 -68-12 

 -66-12 

 -67 -13 

 -66-10 

 -6.5-23 

 -52- 3 



Annual crop production, 

 6-year average. 



Weight 



Pounds. 



150.6 



149.8 



148.1 



145. 4 



144.0 



14.3.3 



143. 1 



136. 8 



136. 4 



134.7 



131.5 



128.6 



127.3 



126. 4 



122.6 



119.4 



118.7 



118.6 



116. 3 



113. 



112.0 



111.6 



111.5 



111.4 



110.1 



108.0 



106.4 



105. 6 



105. 2 



104.4 



100.8 



100.2 



100.2 



99.6 



98.2 



92.5 



85.5 



84.3 



■83.1 



78.5 



76.5 



72.6 



69.5 



68.6 



62.7 



55.8 



Num- 

 ber. 



Or- 

 chard 

 grade. 



444 

 384 

 404 

 426 

 371 

 371 

 359 

 376 

 345 

 363 

 351 

 364 

 365 

 333 

 349 

 325 

 312 

 328 

 329 

 317 

 307 

 327 

 291 

 317 

 318 

 319 

 308 

 293 

 284 

 297 

 284 

 272 

 308 

 292 

 278 

 267 

 252 

 243 

 239 

 217 

 224 

 198 

 198 

 180 

 178 

 119 



P.ct. 

 80.3 

 79.6 

 76.6 

 79.6 

 80.4 

 81.6 

 82.4 

 83.2 

 80.2 

 82.0 

 80.2 

 82.0 

 84.0 

 82.2 

 79.4 

 76.4 

 79.6 

 76.8 

 72.6 

 82.3 

 80.0 

 75.2 

 79.8 

 79.0 

 78.8 

 73.4 

 76.3 

 81.6 

 78.3 

 74.6 

 78.2 

 71.8 

 74.8 



■78.6 

 77.4 

 75.8 

 69.6 

 80.8 

 73.0 

 72.6 

 74.0 

 65.2 

 76.3 

 73.6 

 75.2 

 63.0 



Vari- 

 able 

 fruits. 



P. ct. 



0.90 

 .52 

 .32 



1.24 

 .54 

 .49 



1.06 

 .61 



1.30 

 .36 

 .28 



1.10 

 .36 

 .84 

 .72 

 .92 

 .48 

 .85 



1.15 

 .57 

 .81 



1.38 

 .69 

 .41 

 .72 

 .63 

 .42 

 .85 



1.51 



1.11 

 .46 

 .11 



1.47 

 .51 

 .90 

 .75 



3.37 



1.44 

 .63 

 .37 

 .58 



2.52 

 .40 

 .17 



1.40 



1.68 



Table II shows not only the great variations in the average quan- 

 tity of fruit produced by different individual trees, but also the per- 

 centages of the Orchard grade, or first-grade, fruit. The number of 

 variable fruits shows the variations in the uniformity of the fruit. 



To indicate more fully and accurately the real variations between 

 the different trees and their true relative values to the investigator 

 and the orchardist, it is necessary to consider the yearly record of 

 each tree. 



The complete performance records of 35 representative trees of the 

 151 on which data have been secured for six years are given in Table 

 III. This list was made by selecting within each strain those trees 

 whose average total crops were nearest the multiples of 10 pounds. 

 This basis was adopted in order to remove all chance for any personal 

 bias in the selection of the trees. 



