126 



BULLETIN 623, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 



Table IV includes all the trees listed in Table II, and it is interesting 

 to note the relative position of these trees when they are listed accord- 

 ing to their rank for the two periods. Tables VI and VII show these 

 comparisons for some of the highest and some of the lowest pro- 

 ducing trees. 



Table VI. — Comparative rank of the 19 of the 40 highest producing and of the 17 of the 

 40 lowest producing Washington Navel orange trees in the 4-year performance record 

 plats on which data were also obtained for the 6-year period. 



[Trees marked with an asterisk (*) are not included in the 6-year record plat.] 



Highest producing trees. 



Lowest producing trees. 





Rank for the 4-year 

 period. 



Rank for 



the 6-year 



period. 2 



Tree 



| designation. 



Rank for the 4-year 

 period. 





Tree 

 designation. 



The 40 



highest 



producing 



trees. 1 



The 19 



trees for 



which 



records 



have been 



obtained 



for 6 years. 



The 40 



lowest 



producing 



trees. 



The 17 



trees for 



which 



records 



have been 



obtained 



for years. 



Rank for 



the 6-year 



period. 



3-14-27 



1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 



8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

 26 

 27 

 28 

 29 

 30 

 31 

 32 

 33 

 34 

 35 

 36 

 37 

 38 

 39 

 40 



1 



2 



1 

 2 



♦6:1-55- 5 



♦10:2- 7-17 



7:1-52- 3 



♦SM-3-32-15 



♦7:1-53-11 



7:1-67-13 



7:1-65-23 



7:1-66-12 



♦6:1-71-10 



♦SM-3-29-16 



♦SM-3-32-20 



7:1-66-10 



7:1-68-12 



♦6:1-71- 7 



7:1-68-14 



♦SM-3-33- 15 



♦6:1-64- 3 



7:1-68- 8 



♦SM-3-33-12 



7:1-67- 6 



♦7:1-51-20 



♦10:2- 6-13 



7:1-67- 9 



♦10:2- 8-14 



♦SM-3-32-17 



7:1-67- 8 



♦SM-3-25-16 



♦SM-3-33- 14 



♦10:2- 6-12 



♦SM-3- 33-13 



♦10:2- 8-15 



7:1-67-12 



7:1-68-10 



♦7:1-53-12 



7:1-67- 7 



7:1-68- 9 



♦SM-3-31-14 



7:1-68- 6 



♦SM-3-30-15 



7:1-68-13 



1 



2 



3 



4 



5 



6 



7 



8 



9 



10 



11 



12 



13 



14 



15 



16 



17 



18 



19 



20 



21 



22 



23 



24 



25 



26 



27 



28 



29 



30 



31 



32 



33 



34 



35 



36 



37 



38 



39 



40 







3-12-28 







♦11-52-13 



1 



1 



♦11-52-15 









3-13-29 



3 



3 



6 







3-13-28 

 *3-23-27 



2 

 3 

 4 



4 

 2 



3-12-29 

 *ll-52-14 



5 



5 



5 



3-12-30 

 3-14-26 



6 



7 



1 







*8-16-20 



5 

 6 



7 



3 



*7:2-34- 2 







6 



*3-22-27 









♦11-52-12 







8 



4-27-16 



8 

 9 



10 

 11 



9 



11 



10 



• 14 





7:2-37- 1 







7:2-25- 1 

 10:1-28- 9 



8 



7 



*3- 13-25 



9 



9 



*3-14-23 









*5-41- 7 











10:1-29- 2 

 ♦7:2-30- 1 



12 



20 



10 



10 



7:2-32- 3 



13 



15 







*5-36- 1 



11 



13 



10:1-29- 8 



14 

 15 



12 



8 





3-14-25 







♦5-40- 4 







♦5-41- 6 











10:1-32- 6 



16 



18 







*5-40- 5 



12 

 13 



15 



4-23- 3 

 *9- 2- 5 



17 



19 



11 



*7:2- 8- 1 







14 

 15 



12 



*7:2-17- 2 







14 



♦5-38- 6 









*7:l-59-ll 







16 



17 



7.2-25- 3 



18 

 19 



21 

 30 





10:1-30- 9 



17 



16 



i Ranked as shown. in Table IV. 



2 Ranked as shown in Table II. 



Table VI shows the comparative rank of 19 trees on which records 

 have been secured for six years, which are among the 40 highest 

 producing trees in the <i-year plat. Column 3 in this table shows the 

 4-year rank in which the trees would be listed if only those were 



