STATUS AND VALUE OP FARM WOODLOTS. 31 



Table 9. — Woodlot income in per cent of total income, 1010 — Continued. 







Proportion of total farm 



income, 1910. 





State or State group. 



Division 

 I. 



Division 

 II. 



Division 

 III. 



Division 

 IV. 



Division 

 V. 



Division 

 VI. 



Total. 



Middle Atlantic: 



Per cent. 

 1.1 



Per cent. 

 4.1 

 2.0 

 3.4 



3.5 

 3.5 

 1.8 

 2.4 

 3.3 



4.7 

 3.6 

 3.0 



1.8 

 5.0 



Per cent. 



8.8 

 1.8 

 7.3 



5.2 

 5.5 

 2.9 

 4.5 

 6.2 



11.2 



7.3 

 4.6 



6.8 

 4.9 

 6.8 

 7.1 

 5.8 

 2.2 

 3.9 

 6.8 



8.2 

 4.1 

 4.8 

 3.1 

 2.1 

 2.4 



Per cent. 

 15.2 

 2.6 

 13.5 



3.5 

 6.7 



Per cent. 



Per cent. 



Per cent. 

 5.4 









1.9 





1.8 



1.6 

 1.0 

 .7 

 1.0 

 1.0 



4.1 

 2.1 

 1.0 



20.5 





4.3 



North Centra] ; 



Ohio 





3.1 









3.1 









1.2 











2.0 





11.6 



20.2 

 22.1 



9.8 



7.3 

 28.4 





3.7 



Lake States: 



Michigan i 





6.4 





6.0 





35.8 



44.8 



3.9 



South Atlantic: 



3.8 







12.2 

 11.4 

 13.4 



7.9 

 3.0 



5.8 

 8.4 



11.0 

 9.4 

 5.6 

 5.5 

 6.5 

 4.5 







6.5 







9.0 

 27.1 

 10.4 



5.2 

 14.0 

 20.4 



23.3 

 11.3 

 10.6 

 7.9 

 8.6 

 . 11.8 





8.6 







7.2 





10.4 







16.6 

 21.2 

 15.5 



8.4 



South Carolina 







3.3 



Georgia 







6.2 









11.6 



South Central: 



1.9 



2.1 



7.0 







6.2 











6.2 







2.3 





4.4 









4.8 





1.5 



.5 





3.4 









The value to the individual farm of the woodlot products reported 

 to the 1910 census averaged $81. In order to ascertain the approxi- 

 mate values per farm of the amounts which were either sold or con- 

 sumed on the farm in the different woodlot divisions, 450 counties 

 were chosen at random from the different divisions in each State. 

 The total values for each county were divided by the number of 

 farms reporting. On the average, less than half of all the farms 

 reported, so that the average income, based on all the farms in the 

 counties, would have been smaller. The average total value per 

 farm reporting ranged, as a rule, from about $30 to over $400, 

 smallest in the counties in woodlot Division I and largest in those 

 in Division VI. The average values of the amounts used on the 

 farms were exceedingly constant throughout the woodlot divisions. 

 The values of the amounts sold, on the other hand, were naturally 

 much the greatest in the thinly settled divisions. Table 10 gives the 

 value per farm of the products used and sold in the selected counties, 

 according to division and State. 



