40 



BULLETIN 1119, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 



Figures 13 and 14 supplement Tables 4 and 6 by showing graphi- 

 cally the computed 1920 lumber production, by States and by species, 

 respectively. 



The several woods which go to make up the bulk of the lumber 

 cut in the United States are treated individually in the following 



BILLI^ONS OF BOARD FEET 

 12 3 4 5 



WASHINGTON 



OREGON 



LOUISIANA 



MISSISSIPPI 



CALIFORNIA AND NEVADA 



ARKANSAS 



ALABAMA 



TEXAS 



NORTH CAROLINA 



WISCONSIN 



VIRGINIA 



FLORIDA 



IDAHO 



TENNESSEE 



GEORGIA 



MICHIGAN 



WEST VIRGINIA 



SOUTH CAROLINA 



MINNESOTA 



PENNSYLVANIA 



MAINE 



KENTUCKY 



NEW YORK 



MONTANA 



MISSOURI 



INDIANA 



NEW HAMPSHIRE 



OHIO 



VERMONT 



OKLAHOMA 



MASSACHUSETTS 



ARIZONA 



NEW MEXICO 



MARYLAND 



CONNECTICUT 



COLORADO 



ILLINOIS 



SOUTH DAKOTA 



NEW JERSEY 



DELAWARE 



IOWA 



RHODE ISLAND 



UTAH 



WYOMING 



KANSAS AND NEBRASKA 



COMPUTED TOTAL LUMBER PRODUCTION IN 1920 BY STATES 

 Fig. 13. — The three Pacific Coast States now stand among the first five in point of production. 



pages. The tabulation for each species shows by States the number 

 of active mills reporting, the quantity reported cut, the proportion 

 of the total reported cut, the average value per thousand feet f . o. b. 

 mill, and the computed total cut. 



The ques.tion is frequently asked in connection with lumber pro- 

 duction figures as to what part shortleaf pine forms of the total 



