CARRYING QUALITIES OF EXPORT CORN. 23 
. 
natural ‘‘Central” 
corn surrounding it 
became badly dam- 
aged. Also, in hold 
4 the dried ‘‘A”’ corn, 
which at time of load- 
ing was lower by 1.4 
per cent in moisture 
and by 5c. c. in acid- 
ity than the dried — 
““B” corn, remained 
sound, while the dried 
““B”’ corn in the same 
relative position of 
stowage as the dried 
“A”? corn became 
badly damaged. 
wilt) 
ISCHARIGED 
Q 
Y 
< 
2 
c 
9 
Q 
Mm 
0 
ly 
S 
kK 
Q 
; 
KR 
ANGE IN 
MM = CONDITION OF THE CORNAS DISCHARGED 
Iie. 15.—Correlation of the temperature and condition of the corn as 
Fic. {4.—Iustrating the results of ‘‘sweat”’ on the top portion of the 
corn under the hatch in hold 3. 
loaded and as discharged, (Cargo No. 1.) 
SOUND KERNELS-—% | 
/ 
(Cargo No. 1.) 
CORRELATION OF THE 
CHANGES IN TEMPERA- 
TURE AND THE CHANGES 
IN ACIDITY, GERMINA- 
TION, MOISTURE CON- 
TENT, AND TEST WEIGHT 
PER BUSHEL. 
The comparison of 
the average condi- 
tion of the natural 
“Central,” natural 
‘‘Southwestern,” 
dried ‘‘A”’ and dried 
econ aka veack 
hold; also the com- 
parison of the aver- 
ages for the total 
corn of each lot at 
the time of loading 
with the averages at 
time of discharge in 
Denmark are shown 
in Table 6. The avy- 
erage condition of 
the corn in each lot 
in the top third, 
middle third, and 
