100 BULLETIN 852, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 



very careful work, but demonstrating to my mind that it was possible 

 to build a cement pipe that roots would not enter. This was a 

 jointed cement pipe built by Mr. Stowell, of Los Angeles. The 

 examination was being made for purposes of reorganization. 



DISCUSSION BY MR. NEWELL. 



With respect to the liability of concrete pipe to show decreased 

 carrying capacity With age, my experience may be of some value. 

 February 26, 1918, I inspected the interior of three concrete pipe 

 lines, the R^ D 1; and M pipes. 



R t pipe (No. 32 and 33a). — Interior diameter 46 inches; thickness 

 of shell 3 inches; laid in winter of 1909-10; in use 8 years. The 

 interior for several hundred feet from the intake appeared as .good 

 as when first laid. The impressions of rivet heads in the steel forms 

 were clearly visible in the concrete. For the first few pipe lengths 

 from the intake there had been a very slight abrasion on the bottom 

 of the pipe. It is over this stretch that the water flows freely when 

 first entering the pipe and down which some gravel rolls. 



D x pipe (No. 23 and 24a). — Interior diameter 30 inches; thickness 

 of shell 3 inches; laid in February-March, 1910; in use 8 years. On 

 account of the relatively small diameter of this pipe, the inspection 

 did not cover any great distance from the intake end. A little 

 abrasion near the bottom of the pipe was observed for the first few 

 feet; thereafter the pipe appeared as good as new, slight irregularities 

 in the forms being clearly indicated on the concrete. 



M pipe. — Interior diameter 47 inches; thickness of shell 2% 

 inches; laid in winter of 1907-8; in use 10 years. On account of 

 some seepage flow into the pipe, inspection had to be made at the 

 outlet end. As in the other two cases, the interior seemed to be in 

 as good a condition as when the pipe was first laid. 



Considering the length of service of the three pipe lines, the fact 

 that they are in use about 7 months each year and dry 5 months, I 

 know of no other type of construction which seems to promise such 

 length of service, coupled with little or no decrease in carrying 

 capacity. 



Some have felt doubt as to the permanence of the concrete pressure 

 pipes with thin shells on account of the possible destruction of the 

 steel due to the slow passage of water through the shell. A few days 

 ago we had occasion to cut into the D t pipe for the purpose of insert- 

 ing a valve, and found the steel as bright as when first laid. I am 

 sending you a small section herewith. 1 The sample of steel was 

 taken where the pipe is subjected to a head of slightly more than 40 

 feet. Samples taken from other pipe lines have uniformly given the 

 same result, indicating that there is little likelihood of deterioration 

 in steel in this type of pipe. I may add that in no case has our 

 reinf orced-concrete pipe, built by the wet process, shown any material 

 defects of construction or any sign of deterioration. 



1 To all appearances the steel is new. 



ADDITIONAL COPIES 



OF THIS PUBLICATION MAT BE PROCURED FROM 



THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS 



GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 



WASHINGTON, D. C. 



AT 



25 CENTS PER COPY. 



V 



