dcsimg
Please read BHL's Acknowledgment of Harmful Content
Report an error
Close Dialog

Text Sources


Page text in BHL originates from one of the following sources:
Uncorrected OCR Machine-generated text. May include inconsistencies with the content of the original page.
Error-corrected OCR Machine-generated, machine-corrected text. Better quality than Uncorrected OCR, but may still include inconsistencies with the content of the original page.
Manual Transcription Human-created and reviewed text. For issues concerning manual transcription text, please contact the original holding institution.
  • Pages
  • Table of Contents
Scientific Names on this Page

Indexed by Global Names
Book Title
Histoire générale et particulière des anomalies de l'organisation chez l'homme et les animaux
By
Publication Details
Paris, J.B. Baillière, 1832-1837
DOI
Holding Institution
Cambridge University Library
Sponsor
JISC & NEH
Copyright & Usage
Rights:
Darwin Estate and Cambridge University Library

Copyright Status:
In copyright


Search Inside This Book:
Results For:
Click/Shift+Click pages to select for download
Cancel Generate Review No Pages Added

If you are generating a PDF of a journal article or book chapter, please feel free to enter the title and author information. The information you enter here will be stored in the downloaded file to assist you in managing your downloaded PDFs locally.

Thank you for your request. Please wait for an email containing a link to download the PDF.

For your reference, the confirmation number for this request is .

Join Our Mailing List

Sign up to receive the latest BHL news, content highlights, and promotions.

Subscribe

Help Support BHL

BHL relies on donations to provide free PDF downloads and other services. Help keep BHL free and open!

Donate

There was an issue with the request. Please try again and if the problem persists, please send us feedback.

For your reference, the confirmation number for this request is .

  
Optional
Example: Charles Darwin, Carl Linnaeus
Example: Birds, Classification, Mammals
Contributed by Cambridge University Library
Annotation Not Available

lines 7—9 score
lines 18—20 underline "restent ... grêles"
line 10 underline "elles ... même"

line 5


lines 8—14 score
lines 10—11 annotation X

lines 9—8 score

bottom-margin annotation the «perfect» union «» of th two adjoining arms or legs of some of these monsters, is vry striking .
from End Slip 1, Side 1 annotation 111. The perfect union of one leg or arm of some double monsters very striking


lines 4—8 score


lines 12—10 score


lines 7—1 apparently unintentional mark


lines 11—7 score


lines 8—11 score
line 9 underline "ce ... membre"
top-margin annotation X this, I suppose consists of two limbs united.
     p. 157


whole-margin unmarked
from End Slip 2, Side 2 annotation — at 207 (skim chapters) ☞ (to 349)


lines 11—15 score
lines 11—14 score
lines 12—14 underline "un ... nutrition"
line 21 underline "n'avoir ... aucune"
lines 5—28 annotation case of a perfect ‹monster,› individual bearng another head with no trunk on it — How curious this new course of th arteries


lines 9—12 score
lines 3—1 score
lines 3—2 annotation ?


lines 14—17 score
line 17 underline "La ... pour"
lines 12—26 annotation because the jaw is generally only developed in these parasites — good instance of this Law of "soi pour soi"
bottom-margin annotation V. p 285 where this is discussed.)
     X N.B .
     I dont see, why, if a jaw , enveloped in an amorphous mass , be considered as an individual — why ‹not› an additional finger shd not? He wd answer because an additional finger make asymmitrical part of the perfect individual:— yet why not law of "soi pour soi" put this finger in proper place — improbable


lines 10—7 score
line 6 underline "chez ... grenouille"
line 2 underline "On ... exemples"


lines 2—3 score
lines 4—6 score
lines 12—14 score
show subjects subjects

lines 16—19 score
lines 20—22 score
from End Slip 1, Side 1 annotation 284 — on some «double» monsters breeding , opposed to their sterility ; but then it is th one perfect which breeds. —377 fertile generally.
show subjects subjects


lines 14—21 score
line 13 underline "des ... originairement"
line 15 underline "qu'un ... argument"
line 16 underline "impossibilité"
line 18 underline "épigénèse"
lines 12—6 score
lines 17—18 annotation ? what


lines 4—6 score
lines 5—6 underline "est ... humaine"
lines 7—9 score
line 7 underline "ses ... vaisseaux"
lines 10—12 score
lines 10—11 underline "sinon ... moins"
from End Slip 1, Side 1 annotation 350    domestic animals, like man, have numerous variations in veins


lines 15—14 score
line 15 underline "1 naissance"
line 14 underline "3,000 naissances"
show subjects subjects


lines 13—10 score in pale pencil
lines 12—11 underline in pale pencil "plus ... chien"
line 11 underline "chez le boeuf"
from End Slip 3, Side 1 annotation in pale pencil 352 «X»t01 trunk so frquent in Pig.—    relation between monstrosities & varieties
from End Slip 1, Side 1 annotation 352 monsters occur differently in number & head in different species — a trunk specially common in ‹Ele› Pigs.—
t01 - `X' in reddish-orange crayon


lines 1—3 score
lines 8—9 double score
show subjects subjects

lines 13—15 score


lines 1—7 score
line 2 annotation not domesticatedt01
     ?

from End Slip 1, Side 1 annotation 355. in wild animals vry few monstrosities — «(Q
t01 - `not domesticated' horizontally crossed

line 13 at "classes" annotation Mammifers & Birds
lines 12—9 score
lines 11—10 underline "espèces ... domesticité"
show subjects subjects

lines 6—1 score


line 6 underline "que ... cerf"
line 7 underline "lièvre ... taupe"
line 8 underline "chardonneret"
lines 8—9 underline "espèce ... perroquets"


lines 15—17 score

lines 4—1 score


lines 1—2 underline "Lorsqu'on ... groupes"
lines 11—16 score
from End Slip 1, Side 1 annotation 284 — on some «double» monsters breeding , opposed to their sterility ; but then it is th one perfect which breeds. —377 fertile generally.


lines 3—4 score in pale pencil
line 7 underline "monstres ... viables"
line 8 underline "sont ... ectroméliens"
line 11 underline "donc ... de"
line 12 underline "monstruosités ectroméliens"
lines 15—20 score
show subjects subjects


lines 16—18 score
lines 16—18 annotation (a) next page


lines 1—4 score
lines 5—8 score
lines 9—10 score
lines 7—9 annotation in blue crayon X
lines 2—1 score
lines 4—1 annotation (Q)
lines 17—19 score
from End Slip 3, Side 1 annotation in pale pencil 392    first formd tends monstrous ∵ «(Xt01 late «(Qt02 organs must be affected by first formed (Andral)t03
from End Slip 1, Side 1 annotation 392. organs or parts later formed, always must be affected by causes producing monstrosities.
     «(Q)» quotes Andral — on first formed least monstrous — (shows most monstrosities do not come on very early)

from End Slip 1, Side 3 annotation 392. [he means `592'?] (Q)
t01 - `(X)' in reddish-orange crayon
t02 - `(Q)' in brown ink
t03 - `(Andral)' in brown ink

lines 12—11 score
lines 8—5 score
lines 4—3 score


lines 1—5 score
lines 6—8 score
lines 7—8 annotation cancelled X
lines 9—12 score

lines 4—3 score
lines 4—3 underline "tome ... 723"

bottom-margin annotation (a) [written over `X'] does not this explain variability of hair — size    &c &c ?
     (Q)


lines 1—2 score
lines 5—6 score

lines 7—18 annotation surely in embryos th heart is seen to beat vry soon ? V. Müller
show subjects subjects


lines 6—2 score
lines 6—2 score in dark pencil
lines 5—2 annotation (a)
     (B)

bottom-margin annotation (B)
     therefore applicalbe to any part, ,as skin, which has no central, unitary point.


lines 15—12 score
lines 8—7 score


lines 4—8 score
lines 4—8 score in pale pencil
lines 4—8 annotation “    ”
lines 4—8 annotation (Q)
from End Slip 3, Side 1 annotation in reddish-orange crayon X 402    correlation «(Q)» of Monstrosity without apparent cause
from End Slip 1, Side 1 annotation 402 on coexistence of monstrosities, without «(Q)» any evident relation of parts .


lines 5—3 double score


lines 1—3 score
lines 2—3 underline "de ... (1)"
lines 3—1 score

lines 4—6 score
lines 7—9 score

lines 12—11 score
lines 10—9 score


lines 2—4 score

[continues overleaf] 15—16 score
lines 3—1 score
from End Slip 3, Side 2 annotation 406    distinction betwen amont of development & of functiont01
from End Slip 1, Side 2 annotation 406. distinction between arrest of development & of formation
t01 - `distinction betwen ... function' cancelled


lines 9—12 score
lines 8—9 underline "faite ... féminin"
line 10 underline "de ... hémitéries"
lines 8—10 annotation clitoris?

lines 13—15 score
lines 13—24 annotation pooh! a tailless animal excess of development because man has no tail!!

lines 18—8 score
line 12 underline "et ... douteuse"


lines 20—16 score
lines 13—11 score
lines 6—4 score


lines 3—7 score
lines 4—2 score


lines 11—16 double score


lines 11—6 score


lines 13—15 underline "Les ... supérieurs"
lines 13—15 annotation ?
line 17 underline "offert ... inférieurs"

[continues overleaf] 18—24 score in pale pencil
lines 20—23 annotation in pale pencil (Q)


[continuation] 1—5 annotation (Q)
from End Slip 3, Side 2 annotation 437 «X»t01    Monstrosities resemblng lower animals (Q)
from End Slip 1, Side 2 annotation 437 «(Qt01 cases of monstrosities in man resembling Lower animals resulting frm permanence of embryonic condition
t01 - `X' in reddish-orange crayon
t01 - `(Q)' in pale pencil

[continues overleaf] 11—17 score
line 11 underline "par ... queue"
line 15 underline "absence ... biliaire"
lines 18—26 score
line 22 underline "cloaque"
line 22 underline "la ... matrice"
lines 25—26 underline "bifurcation ... pénial"
lines 7—4 score in pale pencil
lines 4—1 score


lines 11—7 score


line 11 underline "les ... espèces"
line 11 at "embryonnaires" annotation (He means embryological)

lines 8—7 underline "série ... tératologique"
lines 13—1 annotation What is this?
     no variation frm a likeness of th parents can be strictly normal —

from End Slip 1, Side 2 annotation 448 — intimate parallelism between th embryonic, zoological & teratological series.


lines 4—10 annotation V. next page XXX so be cautious— /
     all this he considers only analogy.— /

lines 11—13 score
lines 16—17 score
lines 20—26 score


lines 9—15 score
lines 18—20 score

bottom-margin annotation NB. in case of limbless, tailless, finger-less races (& reverse) th hereditariness must come on at «nearly» same age (as in horns), for th early foetus has not these parts.—


lines 1—19 double score

bottom-margin annotation XXX
     according to the bearng of this discussion, there wd be only an analogy, between a man become fat by much eating, «or large» ‹&› one born ‹with tendeny to fatten, or grw large;› fat or large; which I think is false?—


lines 5—11 score


[continues overleaf] 6 underline "variabilité anomale"
lines 5—1 score
line 2 underline "constante ... importante"
lines 8—6 annotation (Q)
lines 8—4 score
line 10bottom-margin annotation What is Owens law? about these organs? is it that the reduction of these organs is a step in developmt.
from End Slip 1, Side 2 annotation 456 again insists on law of number varying in part when numerous, & being in itself variable
from End Slip 1, Side 2 annotation 456 Summary on laws governing variation — generally rudiments — (hence cause does not act vry early)
show subjects subjects


[continuation] 1—4 score
show subjects subjects

lines 5—11 score
lines 6—7 underline "s'accomplissent ... d'ailleurs"
lines 9—13 annotation & more chance of exposure to new conditions?

lines 14—16 underline "par ... spinal"
lines 15—20 annotation where any connection but not in ‹so› pairs

lines 11—9 score

[continues overleaf] lines 6—1 score
lines 2—1 underline "d'implantations ... zoologique"


lines 1—4 score
line 1 underline "avec ... des"


lines 15—17 score

lines 3—1 score


lines 4—1 score
line 1 underline in dark pencil "seulement apparente"


lines 8—9 double score
lines 8—9 underline "semblables ... analogues"
from End Slip 1, Side 2 annotation 462    on homologous parts uniting both in monstrosities & in Nature.—
     Do not some account for this by division of cells at some period of growth ??

lines 15—12 score
line 12 underline "Loi ... soi"


lines 14—12 score

lines 7—4 score


lines 4—1 score


lines 17—18 score
line 17 annotation ‹I s› ⧟
bottom-margin annotation I shd think the cause must be often anterior to impregntn
from End Slip 1, Side 2 annotation 479— on germs being originally monstrous.


lines 7—9 score in dark pencil
from End Slip 1, Side 2 annotation 499    arguments for monstrosities being produced late & 500    Read , 503 (see Roy Catalogue).— 506, 7

[continues overleaf] 16—17 score
lines 10—6 score


[continuation] 2—4 score

lines 14—16 annotation III
top-marginline 16 annotation Hereditary ‹fingerless› «legless» Dogs & men with polydactyle show that germ can communicate such tendeny
show subjects subjects

lines 17—1 annotation according to this «X» male wd have no influence in producing monstrosities

lines 12—10 score
lines 12—10 score in pale pencil
lines 13—12 annotation in pale pencil see Roy Catalogue
lines 9—7 score in pale pencil
line 9 underline in pale pencil "t. XXXIV"
line 7 underline in pale pencil "t. ... 511"
lines 9—7 double score
bottom-margin annotation Study this to see, whether small deviations, as long legs &c were produced — In plants we know it is from treatmnt of parents & act of generation —
from End Slip 1, Side 2 annotation 499    arguments for monstrosities being produced late & 500    Read , 503 (see Roy Catalogue).— 506, 7


lines 1—4 double score
show subjects subjects

bottom-margin annotation I must allude to (III) this when I give my view of cause of deviations to parents treatmnt before impregnation