IKEIGATIOE' IN NOETHBEN COLOEADO. 



65 



Table 22. — Irrigation of barley in 1916 and 1917. 





s 



O 

 < 



d 

 o 



Depth each irri- 

 gation (feet). 



1 



ft® 



o 



Flow 



in second- 

 feefr. 



ft 



1 ■ 



•It 



u 



■6 



PI 



II 



a to 



03 



Farm. 





Pi 

 O 



3 



a 



s 



> 

 < 



<D CD 

 ft| 



1916. 

 R D Hughes 



35.20 

 17.46 

 10.73 

 13.85 

 14.63 



16.60 

 9.40 

 7.43 

 19.40 

 10.34 

 21.00 

 9.56 

 3.14 

 9.36 

 25.50 



1 

 1 

 1 



1 



2 



2 

 2 

 1 

 1 

 1 

 1 

 1 

 1 

 1 

 1 



0.36 

 1.18 

 .70 

 .54 

 .96 



1.50 

 1.68 

 1.82 



.14 

 1.04 

 1.11 

 1.33 

 1.30 

 1.43 



.78 







0.36 

 1.18 

 . 70 

 .54 

 2.24 



2.33 

 3.96 

 1.82 



.14 

 1.04 

 1.11 

 1.33 

 1.30 

 1.43 



.78 



2.92 

 2.09 

 2.95 

 2.75 

 2.32 



3.56 

 3.60 

 3.80 

 3.25 

 1.64 

 2.91 

 2.31 

 2.91 

 3.43 

 2.13 



i;8i 



1.26 

 2.95 

 2.75 

 1.38 



1.02 

 2.65 

 .87 

 2.25 

 1.30 

 2.53 

 2.16 

 2.91 

 2.95 

 1.85 



2.41 

 1.86 

 2.95 

 2.75 

 1.92 



1.50 

 3.39 

 2.20 

 2.30 

 1.48 

 2.62 

 2.20 

 2,91 

 3.24 

 2.02 



13.25 

 3.13 

 8.32 



10.07 

 3.39 



2.52 

 3.39 

 2.92 

 31.04 

 2.82 

 4.67 

 3.27 

 4.43 

 4.49 

 5.14 



0.89 

 .89 

 .68 

 .73 

 .57 



.71 

 .65 

 .74 

 .27 

 .63 

 .41 

 .30 

 .71 

 .74 

 .70 



39.80 









38.10 



C A Culver 







36.80 









6.40 



Farmers' National Bank- 

 Page. 



Carpenter-Lyning 



Jackson- Alles ... 



1.28 



.83 

 2.28 





18.60 



14.30 

 54.50 





17.20 



A. L Bee 







13.30 



Frank Wells 







15.00 



Frank J Earle 







59.50 









33.50 









47 80 









41.45 









66.00 











Total 



224. 45 

 14.02 



























1.18 



2 



1 



1 

 1 

 1 

 1 

 2 

 2 

 2 

 1 

 1 

 1 

 2 

 1 

 1 

 2 

 2 

 3 



.91 



1.33 





1.15 



3.96 



.14 



.68 

 1.00 



.97 

 1.25 

 3.11 

 1.65 

 2.20 

 1.98 



.85 

 1.15 

 1.00 



.87 

 1.08 

 1.42 



.76 

 1.00 







2.16 

 3.39 

 1.48 



1.42 

 .99 

 1.60 

 2.33 

 1.96 

 1.13 

 3.12 

 1.40 

 1.73 

 2.27 

 1.35 

 3.97 

 3.94 

 5.22 

 1.14 

 2.06 



4.39 



31. 04 



2.52 



4.12 

 1.95 

 5.83 

 3.70 

 2.50 

 2.74 

 5.50 

 1.39 

 4.04 

 3.91 

 5.33 

 9.10 

 7.24 



14.52 

 6.00 



11.99 



.66 

 .89 

 .27 



.93 

 .31 

 .50 

 .16 

 .51 

 .66 

 .75 

 .37 

 .75 

 .39 

 .53 

 .41 

 .64 

 .87 

 1.00 

 .81 



35.47 





3.80 



1.44 

 .99 

 1.60 

 4.00 

 3.40 

 1.35 

 4.10 

 1.90 

 2.47 

 3.30 

 1.92 

 4.02 

 4.02 

 5.53 

 1..36 

 2.07 



".'87' 



1.35 



.99 



1.60 



1.10 



.73 



.53 



1.07 



1.09 



.72 



1.44 



1.22 



3.78 



3.48 



3.94 



.75 



1.94 



66.00 













6.40 



1917. 



9.28 

 5.43 

 5.83 



12.64 

 7.81 

 3.03 

 7.68 

 5.00 



15.30 



21.00 

 9.49 

 7.39 

 9.36 

 5.90 

 4.51 



10.40 



.68 



1.00 



.97 



1.25 



2.10 



.86 



1.40 



1.98 



.85 



•1.15 



.54 



.87 



1.08 



.17 



.47 



.19 







62.20 



Sha:fer-Uhrick 







5.50 



Carpenter-Lyning 







40.00 









Farmers' National Bank- 

 Page. 



A L Bee 



i.oi 



.77 

 .80 





39.70 

 33.30 

 18.20 

 46 00 



Frank Wells 







63 00 



Frank J Earle 







60 00 





.46 





56.90 

 46.30 









46.40 



Minor- Miller 



1.25 

 .29 

 .19 



".'62' 



46.40 

 61.40 





62.80 







Total 



140. 05 

 8.75 

























Average 



1.42 



3 



1 



.98 



.64 



.62 



i.2.5 

 3.11 



.68 



5.' 53' 



".'53' 



2.00 



5.22 



.99 



4.52 

 14.52 

 1.39 



.55 

 1.00 

 .10 



49.16 





63.00 













5.50 















Table 23. — Irrigation of sugar beets in 1916. 





. 





Water applied each 



-d 



Flow in 



§3 

 ft 



Id 



03 >- 



^ 





i 



3 

 



irrigation (feet). 



ft 

 ft 



second-feet. 



1 



Jiarm. 



13 

 2 



•1 













5? 

 ft« 



a 



p] 





Mb 





C3 















. 





■O 



3 



PI 



a 



















d 



1^- 



1 



1 



^ 



M 

 S 



in 



1 

 



a 



03 



2 

 > 



-^ 



s"^ 



■2^ 



03 



"3 





<f 



f=H 



CD 



t^ 



fR 



f^ 





g 



s 



-^ 



<t; 



rt 



>^ 



R. D . Hughes 



13.50 



3 



90 



60 



0,17 







1 64 



? sn 



1 34 



? 1^ 



7.57 



89 



12.40 



Wilson-Campbell 



17.10 



3 



.39 



,30 



61 







1,.30 



4 05 



75 



?■ 65 



12. 13'l.00ll0.30 



John A. Mair 



32.54 

 7.65 



3 

 3 



.67 

 .90 



.55 



ns 







1.30 



2.88 



1.59 

 1.44 



.54 

 .68 



1.01 

 1.20 



4 65 .771IO. 97 





. 86 1. 12 



2.47 .7610.85 



C. A. Bartels 



24.68 

 33.60 



3 

 3 



1.46 

 .78 



.871.49 







3.82 

 2.73 



4.97 



5.15 



4.10 

 1.00 



4.47 

 4.09 



6 97 .681 17. 11 





1.171 .78|.... 



8.90 .89115.81 



