﻿LITERATURE CITED 



(1) Brose, C. M. 



1888. Bees fed with sirup containing arsenic. In Colo. Agr. Exp. Sta. 



1st Ann. Rpt., pp. 233-234. 



(2) Cook, A. J. 



1889. Spraying with the arsenites. In Mich. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bui. 53, 



pp. 260-264. 



(3) 



1891. How strong shall we p Lonclm-i purple? In 30th Ann. Rpt. Mich. 



State Bd. Agr., 18iA yi, p. 3 ." 



(4) Cook, F. C, and N. E. McIndoo. 



1923. Chemical, physical, and insecticitial properties of arsenicals. U. S. 

 Bept. Agr. Bui. 1147, 57 pp. 



(5) DOANE, R. W. 



1923. Bees vs. spraying. In Jour. Econ. But., vol. 16, pp. 527-531. 



(6) Felt, E. P. 



1900. Bees and spraying — a warning. In Country Gent., vol. 65, p. 470. 



(7) Gates, B. N. 



1914. An inquiry into the spraying laws of North America in their rela- 

 tion to beekeeping interests. In 61st Ann. Rpt. Mass. State Bd. 

 Agr., 1913, pp. 281-284. 



(8) Holland, E. B. 



1916. Detection of arsenic in bees. In Jour. Econ. Ent., vol. 9, pp. 

 364-366. 



(9) MclNDOo, N. E. 



1916. Effects of nicotine as an insecticide. In Jour. Agr. Research, vol. 

 7, pp. 89-122, illus. 



(10) 



1923. Effect on honeybees of treating cotton plants with calcium arsen- 



ate. Amer. Bee. Jour., vol. 63, No. 6, p. 285. 



(11) Merrill, J. H. 



1924. Bees vs. spraying. In Amer. Bee Jour., vol. 64, p. 134. 



(12) Price, W. A. 



1920. Bees and their relation to arsenical sprays at blossoming time. In 

 Ind. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bui. 247, 15 pp., illus. 



(13) Webstek, F. M. 



1892. Spraying with arsenites vs. bees. In Insect Life, vol. 5, pp. 



121-123. 



(14) 



1894. Spraying with arsenites vs. bees. In Insect Life, vol. 7, np. 

 132-134. 



(15) WOODWORTH, C. W. 



1914. Entomology. Tn Calif. Agr. Exp. Sta. Rpt., 1913-14, pp. 109- 

 118, illus. 



32 



ADDITIONAL COPIES 



OF THIS PUBLICATION MAT BE PROCURED FROM 



THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS 



GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 



WASHINGTON, D. C. 



AT 



S CENTS PER COPY 

 V 



