The relatively greater length of hody in the women of Taytay seems 

 to be due to the predominance of the Primitive ty^De among the Blends 

 as indicated in tlie following tables : 



Relative sitting height by type. 

 MEN OP TAYTAY. 



Relative 

 sitting I 

 height, i 



Primitive 



Modified Primitive. 



Australoid 



Blend 



.\lpine 



Iberian 



B. B. B 



Cro-Magtion 



I.1O.2 

 156.3 

 157.7 

 15S.8 

 1.59. 8 

 160.8 

 165.4 

 167.8 



53.6 

 .53.2 



.52. 9 

 ■52.8 



53.1 

 .52.6 



WOMEN OF TAYTAY. 







zr ' 



stature, 



Relative 

 sitting 

 height. 



1 









Primitive 



Australoid 



Alpine 



Blend 



Modified primit 



Iberian 



B. B. B 



Adriatic 



2 



141.20 



7 



144. 40 



2 



147.45 



30 



147.73 



2 



149. 15 



12 



151.20 



1 



155.30 



1 



1.55.80 



.52. 66 

 52. 59 

 51.73 

 53. 15 

 53. 30 

 .52. 08 

 52.93 . 

 52. IS 



The sitting height in general is relatively less for the tall than for 

 the small individuals. 



Taken by. tj-pe, the Blend, with less stature than some other types, 

 has relatively greater sitting height, and this diiference is greater in the 

 females than in the males. The Primitive t}'pe, also with less stature 

 than any other t}'pe, has a greater relative sitting height among the 

 males than any other type except the Australoid, and among the females 

 a greater relative sitting height than any other except the modified 

 Primitive, Blend, and B. B. B. This indicates that the Australoid 

 males and the modified Primitive, Blend, and B. B. B. females are in- 

 fluenced in relative sitting height by the Primitive, provided, of course, 

 we accept the conclusions of the author, that the Primitive has a relatively 

 long bod}^ and short legs. The Australoid type resembles the Primitive 

 among females, and the Iberian among males, in both stature and relative 

 sitting height, which may lead us to thinli that the primary inhabitants 

 were Primitive and the secondary Iberian, provided again we accept the 

 conclusions of the author that the Australoid is a product of the Iberian 

 and Primitive with mosaic characteristics, especially the disharmonic 



