FEEDING STUFF INSPECTION. 



59 



Analyses of Samples. 



Name of Feed and Manufacturer or Shipper. 



Peotein. 



Fat. 



's 5 

 c a 



S u 

 O (D 



fa a 



5 



<D ■ 



c c 



c o 



C <D 



fa a 



c a 

 'J a 



Golden Ball Mixed Feed 



Lawrenceberg Roller Mills, Indiana 



Mixed Feed s 



Huron Millinf? Co ) 



Mixed Feed 



Ohio Cereal Co 



Mixed Feed 



Lawrenceberg Roller Mills, Indiana. 



Mixed Bran and Shorts 



Farmers Milling Co 



Peerless Mixed Feed 



Pillsbury's Daisy Feed Flour 



Vermont Mixed Flour . 

 Flint Mill Co 



Winterwheat Bran 



Lawrenceberg Roller Mills, Ind 



Worthmore Wheat J<'eed. 

 C. M. Cox Co. Boston 



Blue Grass Mixed Feed 



A. Waller & Co., Henderson, Ky. 



Indiana Mixed Feed 



Jersey Mixed Feed 



Kentucky Milling Co 



1 



1.1.63 



- 



- 



- 



12.06 



- 



- 



- 



15.50 



- 



- 



- 



16.40 



- 



- 



- 



16.63 



- 



- 





14.93 

 15.13 



_ 



- 



_ 



20. 7f. 



- 



- 



- 



15.06 



- 



4.50 



- 



15.00 



- 



- 



- 



ie..38 



17.00 



4.95 



4.00 



10.88 



- 



2.30 



- 



11.00 

 11.38 



- 



3.07 



- 



10.63 



1 



11.00 



3.00 



3.00 



10737 

 10735 

 10680 

 10720 



10676 



10646 

 10726 



10630 



10728 

 10719 

 10685 



10677 



10762 

 10778 



10733 



DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS OF ANALYSES. 



With SO limited an amount of money as the State appropriates 

 for the purpose of the inspection of the sale of feeding stuffs, it 

 is not possible to make in any given year as exhaustive a study, 

 either in the field or the laboratory, as is desirable. From the 

 standpoint of the average purchaser of commercial feeding stuffs 

 in this State, protein is the most important constituent, and is 

 always determined in all samples collected. In at least one sam- 

 ple of each brand collected, the fat (ether extract) is deter- 

 mined. In special cases further studies, particularly of the 



