^T,6 MAINE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION. 1912. 



All 2 Progeny 



Winter l-'roduciion: Over 30 Under 30 Zero 



Observed 19 21 4 



Expected ig.i 22 2.0 



Mean winter production 46.00 eggs 10.60 eggs eggs 



The agreement here between observation and expectation is 

 indeed remarkably close, and with a fairly large progeny. 



Summary of results of all matings of class 4 males. Pro- 

 ceeding as before we may bring together here the results for 

 each pa^rticular gametic combination taking all individuals to- 

 gether. While class 4 males were not used as often in these 

 experiments as those of class 7, still the numbers involved are 

 sufficiently large to give quite definite evidence regarding the 

 segregation of fecundity factors. 



TABLE 17 



Sliozving the results of all matings of class 4 c^ c? X class / ? ? 



fL,L, . fkk X fL,L, . FIA 



Number of Individ- 

 uals Involved in 

 Matings op This Type 



Winter Egg Pkoduction 



of Daughtees 



c?c^ , 



99 



Class 



Over 30 Under 30 



'Total adult 9 

 Zero progeny 



4 



17 



Observed 

 Expected 



21 ."^0 



22.1 29.5 1 



8 

 7.4 



59 



t i 



Mean winter egg production of all' 1 [ 



9- 9 in indicated class 48.85 eggsll6.34 eggs 



eggs 



TABLE 18 



Shozving the results of all matings of class 4 c? J' X class i" ? ? 



Number of Individ- 

 uals Involved in 

 Matings or This Type 



Winter Egg Production op Daughters 



d^d* 



99 



Class 



Over 30 



Under 30 



Zero 



Total adult 9 

 progeny 



3 



16 



Observed 

 Expected 



21 



19 



16.5 



19 





 



38 



Mean winter production of all 9 9 ' 



in indicated class 50.38 eggs[16.69 eggs 



1 ! 



' 



