OFFICIAL INSPECTIONS 72. 



Feeding Stuffs — Continued. 



159 



Brand, Maker and Guaranties. 



Results of Examination. 



Pure Winter Wheat Bran. Williams Bros. 

 Co., Kent, O. Pure winter wheat. Con- 

 tains not more than 12 per cent, crude 

 fiber, and not less than 4 per cent, fat and 

 9 per cent, protein. Registered in 1914. 

 Not registered in 1915. 



Pure Winter Wheat Middlings. Williams 

 Bros. Co., Kent, O. Pure winter wheat. 

 Contains not more than 15 per cent, crude 

 fiber, and not less than 2 per cent, fat and 

 10 per cent, protein. Registered in 1914. 

 Not registered in 1915. 



Kent Mixed Feed. Williams Bros. Co., Kent, 

 O. Pure Ohio wheat bran and pure winter 

 wheat middlings mixed. Contains not 

 more than 15 per cent, crude fiber, and not 

 less than 2 per cent, fat ai d 12 per cent, 

 protein. Registered in 1914 and 1915. 



Wheat bran. Williamson Milling Co., Clay 

 Center, Kans. Contains not more than 12 

 per cent, crude fiber, and not less than 3.5 

 per cent, fat and 15.5 per cent, protein. 

 Registered in 1914. Not registered in 1915. 



Bran. Yerxa, Andrews & Thurston, Inc., 

 Minneapolis, Minn. Contains not more 

 than 13 per cent, crude fiber, and not less 

 than 5.5 per cent, fat and 12 per cent, pro- 

 tein. Not registered in 1914. Registered 

 in 1915. 



Flour Middlings. Yerxa, Andrews & Thurs- 

 ton, Inc., Minneapolis, Minn. Contains 

 not more than 6.5 per cent, crude fiber, and 

 not less than 5.5 per cent, fat and 15.5 per 

 cent, protein. Not registered in 1911. 

 Registered in 1915. 



No goods of this brand were found by in- 

 spectors. The protein guarantee in the 

 opposite column is meaningless and is 

 apparently an attempted evasion of the 

 anal.vsis feature of the feeding stuffs law. 

 Compare the guarantee of any of the 

 rehable brands of bran. 



The only official sample obtained was in 

 accord with the guarantees as stated in 

 the opposite column. These guarantees 

 are meaningless, as no wheat middlings 

 could have anything remotely resembling 

 this composition, and are apparently an 

 attempted evasion of the analysis feature 

 of the feeding stuffs law. Compare the 

 guarantees of any of the reliable brands 

 of middlings. 



Two official samples were both in accord 

 with the guarantees as stated in the op- 

 posite column. These guarantees are 

 meaningless as no wheat mixed feed 

 could have anything like this composi- 

 tion, and are apparently an attempted 

 evasion of the analysis feature of the 

 feeding stuffs law. Compare the guar- 

 antees of any of the reliable brands of 

 mixed feed. Both samples contained a 

 few hulls of corn cockle. 



No goods -of this brand were found by 

 inspectors. 



No goods of this brand were found by 

 inspectors. 



No goods of this brand were found by 

 inspectors. 



ADULTERATED WHEAT BY-PRODUCTS. 



Holstein Feed. Indiana Milling Co., TerreNo goods of this brand were found by 

 Haute, Ind. Composed of wheat bran with | inspectors, 

 ground screenings not exceeding mill run. 1 

 Cob meal. Contains not more than 16 per 

 cent, crude fiber, and not less than 3 per 

 cent, fat and 12 per cent, protein. Regis- 

 tered in 1914 and 1915. 



Sterling Feed. Indiana Milling Co.. 



Haute, Ind. Wheat bran, with ground 

 screenings not exceeding mill run. Ground 

 corn and cob. Contains not more than 16 

 per cent, crude fiber, and not less thaai 3 per 

 cent, lat and 10 per cent, protein. Regis- 

 tered in 1914 and 1915. 



TerrelOf 3 official samples, 2 were up to guar- 

 antee in protein and one was over one-half 

 per cent, below. The low sample was 

 examined for fiber and fat and found up 

 to guarantee in the latter, but slightly 

 high in fiber. In one sample many, in 

 one a few, in one no weed seeds were 

 found. All contained a few hulls of corn 

 cockle and wild buckwheat. 



