Animal Husbandry Investigations in 1916. 



133 



TABLE 3. 



Shozving the Influence of Certain Jersey Bulls on the Breed, as 



Indicated By the Average Yearly Production of Milk of 



Their Daughters as Compared With That of the 



Dams of These Daughters. 



+denot9S that daughter's average was higher than dams' average 

 — denotes that daughter's average was lower than dams' average 



NAME OF BULL 



LBS. or MILK BY WHICH D.-iUGHTEES 

 AVEEAf.'E IS DIFFERENT FEOM DAMS' 



Group A. Bulls which significantly 

 lowered the productivity 

 of their daughters. 



Hector Marigold 5912T 

 Hood Farm's, Tormentor 76311 

 Irene's King Pogis 73182 

 Lady Letty's Victor 65020 

 Mabel's Raleigh 77913 

 Hood Farm Torono 21st 83413 

 Noble of Oaklands 95700 

 Hood Farm Torono 20th 82854 

 Mabel's Poet 6578D 



3001.0 

 1555.6 

 1540.9 

 1396.2 

 965.7 

 800.5 

 458.3 

 252.8 

 139.0 



Oroup B. Bulls wihch neither lowered 





nor increased productivi- 





ty significantly 





Tonona PogLs 78657 



96.9 



Interested Prince 58224 



70.1 



Gedney Farm Oxford Lad 71338 



128.7 



Oroup C. Bulls tvhich significantly 





increased the productivity 





of their daughters. 





Flying Fox's Victor 64768 



2&5.0 



Look-out Torono 78593 



385.7 



Hood Farm Pogis 9th 55.552 



464.3 



Mabel's Oxford Lad 66518 



.590.0 



Gamboge's Knight 95968 



627.4 



Raleigh's Fairv Boy 83767 



715.8 



Emment's Raleigh 69011 



1313.0 



Royal Majesty 79313 



2138.6 



Hood Farm Pogis 34th 63300 



2427.5 



Fontaine's King 65641 



28S0.0 



Hood Farm Torono 60326 



2946.1 



