Animal Husbandry Investigations in 1916. 



135 



TABLE 5. 



Showing the Influence of Certain Jersey Bulls on the Breed, as 



Indicated By the Average Yearly Production of Milk of 



Their Daiigliters as Compared With That of the 



Dams of These Daughters. 



+ denotes that daughter's average was higher than dams' average 

 — denotes that daughter's average was lower than dams' average 



NAME OF BULL 



IjBS. of butter f.-vt by -which daughtees' 



AVERA :e is different FROM DAMS' 



Oroap A. Bulls ivhich significantly 

 lowered the productivity 

 of their daughters. 



■+ 



- 



Hector Marigold 59121 

 Hood rarm S. Tormentor 76311 

 Mabel's Raleigh 77913 

 Eminent's Raleigh G9311 

 Irene's King Pogis 73182 

 Raleigh's Fairy Boy 83767 

 Lady Letty's Victor 65023 

 Hood Farm Torono 20th 82854 

 Hood Farm Torono 21st 83413 

 Mabel's Poet 65780 





106..55 

 61.59 

 46.00 

 41.74 

 35.12 

 31.72 

 21.72 

 21.27 

 20.85 

 11.88 



Group B. Bulls which neither lowered 

 nor increased productiviy 

 significantly 



Interested Prince 58224 

 Gedney Farm Oxford Lad 71238 

 Lookout Torono 78593 

 Noble of Oakiands 95700 



0.41 

 1..57 

 1.70 

 4.24 





Group C. Bulls which significantly 

 increased the productivity 

 of their daughters. 



Flying Fox's Victor 64768 

 Tonona Pogis 78657 

 Gamboge's Knight 95698 

 Hood Farm P(jgis 9th 5.5552 

 Mabel's Oxford Lad 66518 

 Royal Majesty 79313 

 Fontaine's King 65641 

 Hood Farm Pogis 34th 6.3300 

 Hood Farm Torono 60326 



33.94 



47.00 



47.49 



51.83 



60.76 



81.34 



101.37 



140.48 



148.56 





