Chilton, — Additions to the New Zealand Crustacea. 171 



PAGE 



95. Diloma cethiops is not Monodonta reticularis of Gray ; the latter 



ought to be replaced in catalogue, as I have both. 



96. Diloma gaimardi is same as D. sulcatus, Wood. 



96. Trochocochlea mimetica, Hutton, is M. reticularis, Gray. 

 98. Zizyphinus granatus, Chemnitz, is not the same as Z. tigris, 

 Martyn ; the granatus of Dunedin Museum is tigris. 

 103. Margarita fulminata should be a Gihhiila. 



Margarita, nov. sp. — Add to catalogue. Perhaps Gibbula incon- 

 spicua of Hutton, p. 102. 



106. Emarginula Candida, A. Adams — Add. 

 Emarginula tenui-costata — Add. 



Tug alia ossea — Add. 



107. Tectura pileopsis — Add. 

 Tectura fragilis — Add. 



110. Patella stellaris — Add. Like one named corticata in Dunedin 



Museum, but not quite. 

 113. Lepidopleurus crocinus, Eeeve — Add. This is probably L. 



empleurus, Hutton. 

 118. Ischnochiton antiquus, Eeeve — Add. 

 121. Haminea zealandim and ohesa are the same. 

 136. Anatina tasmanica is A. angasii. 



143. Tellina disculus is not the same as sublenticularis of Sowerby. 

 159. Cardita zealandica is the same as compressa of Eeeve. 

 167. Mytilus edulis is neither edulis nor dimkeri of Eeeve. 

 171. Pecten vellicatus, Hutton, is the same as convexus, Q and G, 



and roseapunctaius, Eeeve. 

 Adamsia typica — Add. 



Aet. XXIV. — Additions to the New Zealand Crustacea. 



By Charles Chilton, B.A. 



[Read before the Philosophical Institute of Canterbury, 13t/t October, 1881.] 



Plate Vin. 



This paper contains the descriptions of three new species of Crustacea, 

 two belonging to the Brachyura and one to the Isopoda. I also describe 

 the male of a species of AmpMpoda, the female only having been hitherto 

 known. 



