68 REVIEW—BAGNALL’S FLORA OF WARWICKSHIRE. 
Among the plants recorded for Warwickshire but not for Leicester- 
shire in these two works we find, eee (aes the following :— 
Erophila praccox. 
Dianthus Armeria. 
Stellaria umbrosa. 
atine hexandra 
Enanthe croca 
ra iieabacets Nee 
Vaccinium Oxycoccos. 
Vaccinium Vitis-Idzea. 
Centunculus minimus. 
; Cuscuta epithymum 
Linum angustifolium. Utricularia minor. 
Sparganium neglectum. 
is 
Poterium #2077 anges Carex curta 
Callitriche obtusangula. 
Carum segetum. 
Myrrhis odorata. 
Among the plants recorded by Mr. Mott for Leicestershire, but 
not by Mr. Bagnall for Warwickshire, we note a smaller number, 
including the following :— 
Gentiana campestris. 
Carex stricta. 
Carex distans. 
Lamium intermedium. 
Orobanche cverulea. Eriophorum latifolium 
[N.B. Rubus, Rosa, Hieracium, 
considered]. 
Comparing the numbers as well as they can be compared with 
our West Yorkshire Flora, we have— 
Salix -and Gramine not 
Mortr’s ESTIMATE, 
iS W. 
w.Y. 
Dicotyledones... me ee ee e661 776 is 
Monocotyledones 199° 211 a7 
Vascular acrogens 31 31 47 
891 1018 (a) 1043 
Characez... 4 i" a 12 
usci 179 236 pea SO SAT 
Hepatice 40° 4g : 108 
Liche 177... 10% 234 
Fungi 446 *727 +987 
Algze 234 379 
* Species and var 
ncludes Hymenomycetes, ear Coniomycetes, 
Hyphomycetes, Pekin and Ascomycetes. Warwickshire only the two first- 
Po ae C.P.H. 
(az) Bagnall’s Re ae 1073. 
This fi 
> 
a 
rest ue we urban Pie “_ er pti sett ofa i 
ae 
