36 



H. H. Love and C. E. Leighty 





o 



t^ 



CO 



o 



q 



""^ 



1— 1 



CO 



"* 



L'7 



q 



t^ 



00 



05 



o 



(M 





^. 



.k 



ti 



^ 



1 



C5 



s 



'"I 



7, 



^ 



i 



i 



=^ 



t 



? 



•^ 



1- 2 









2 

























2- 3 



i 



3 



4 



9 



1 







2 

















3- 4 





1 



2 



4 



7 



3 



3 



1 

















4- 5 









3 



6 



8 



11 



5 



2 



1 





1 









5- 6 











4 



1 



13 



5 



2 



5 













6- 7 









1 



4 



4 



10 



20 



13 









3 



1 







7- 8 









2 



2 



6 



5 



13 



3 



12 



5 











8- 9 













3 



12 



11 



8 



7 





3 



1 







9-10 















8 



13 



12 



1 



4 



2 









10-11 















1 



9 



6 



4 



2 





1 







11-12 















1 



5 



5 



12 





4 





1 





12-13 



















1 



5 



5 



3 









13-14 

















1 



3 



2 



3 



4 







1 



14r-15 

















1 





1 



2 



2 



1 







15-15 















1 









1 











16-17 

























1 









17-18 



























1 







18-19 

 19-20 

























1 



1 



2 



1 





1 



1 



6 21 24 25 65 86 55 50 27 25 



1 



Fig. 27. — Total yield of plant in grams, subject 



Average yield of culm per plant in grams, relative. 1912 

 Coefficient of correlation ^= .692 ± .018 





o 



S 



^ 





s 



s 



o 



g 



o 



s 







1 



1 



o 



1 



1 

 ^ 



i 



•^ 



1 



g 



1 



1 



I 



i 





*0- .1 



50 





















50 



.1- .2 



54 



53 



















107 



.2- .3 



2 



154 



3 





1 













160 



.3- .4 





56 



93 

















149 



.4- .5 





5 



109 



4 















118 



.5- .6 







29 



55 



2 



2 











88 



.6- .7 







4 



59 



6 













69 



.7- .8 









11 



16 













27 



.8- .9 









3 



11 



2 











16 



.9-1.0 











6 



4 











10 



1.0-1.1 











3 



7 



5 



1 







16 



1.1-1.2 











1 



2 



1 









4 



1.2-1.3 













1 



1 









2 



1.3-1.4 

















3 



1 





4 



1.4-1.5 

















1 







1 



1.5-1.6 



















2 





2 



1.6-1.7 



























1.7-1.8 





















2 



2 



106 268 238 132 46 18 7 



825 



2 



20 



21 



37 



30 



61 



48 



45 



40 



23 



28 



14 



14 



7 



2 



1 



1 



3 



3 



400 



Fig. 28. — Total yield of culm in grams, subject 



Total number of kernels per culm, relative. 1908 

 Coefficient of correlation = . 947 ± . 002 

 *SiDce, as before noted, the data were taken on culms this year, the classes for yield differ from 

 those of the other years. 



