Bury—On the Roman Empire in Fourth Century, A.D. 507 
PRaEtToRIAN PREFECTS MENTIONED IN CopEx THEODOSIANUS, FROM 
315 A.D. TO 395 A.D. 
A.D, Name. Date or ConstrTUTIons. 
. xi. Kal. Febr. (Caralis) ? 
315 Constantius. SS Teal, We ( ) 
ee xiv. Kal. Oct. (Naissi). 
e cae xv. Kal. Nov. (Murgillo). 
317 Leontius. vii. Kal. Aug. 
318 Florianus.! iv. Id. April. 
2 iv. Id. Maii (Sirmio). 
Sey jptileniny Kal. Dec. (Sirmio). ! 
320 Bassus. xv. Kal. Aug. 
321 Bassus. x. Kal. Jul. (Aquileia). 
324 Constantius. xvi. Kal. Jun. 
325 Constantius. Se hats Cine (desatinoel m2) 
ii. Non. Febr. (Heracleae). 
vii. Kal. Maii (Nicomediae). 
xvi. Kal. Jun. 
326 Evagrius. 
ah Acindynus.3 xv. Kal. Mart. 
. Kal. Jun. 
2 pee bine. xiv. Kal. Oct. 
af Secundus. iii. Kal. Jul. 
xii. Kal. Febr. 
327 Maximus. v. Kal. Oct. (Treviris). 
0 Constantius. ii. Id. Jun. (Constantinople). 
328 Aemilianus. vii. Id. Maii (Romae). 
55 Secundus. Kal. Dee. 
a5 Maximus. iv. Kal. Jun. (Treviris). 
viii. Id. Mart. (Constantinopoll1). 
329 Bassus. vii. Kal. Aug. (Naissi); P. P. Non. 
Oct. (Romae). 
3 Secundus.* xiv. Kal. Mai (Constantinopoli). 
1 Florianus was Pf. P. orientis (cf. vii. 20, 1). 
2 In the year 319 a constitution (iii. 19, 1) is addressed ad Basswm Pf. P., but 
another constitution is addressed (in the same month, October) ad Bassum Pf. U. 
I follow Haenel in supposing that Pf. P. is an error for Pf. U. Similarly, in 
constitutions of 321 and 322 we find the inscription ad Maximum Pf. P., as wellas 
ad Maximum Pf. U., e.g. i. 4, 1. Haenel is doubtless right in reading Pf. U.— 
‘Ego puto Pf. U. (urbis) legendum esse quod etiam codd. in c. un. Th. de Sent. 
pass. (ix. 43) habent et confirmatur a vetere auctore de Praefect urbis ap. Cuspini- 
anum. Saepissime enim a librariis commutantur sigla utriusque dignitatis et Prae- 
fecti Praetorio et Praefecti Urbis, cujus erroris centena sunt exempla.’ 
? The prefecture of Acindynus is perhaps doubtful; at least Gotofredus attri- 
butes vill. 5, 3 to Constantius in the year 339. 
4 Secundo Pf. P. orientis (i. 16, 5), from which inscription we may conclude 
ithat he was P. P. of the East in 328 also. 
