( Ixxxviii ) 



transcription alleged (in a letter purporting to come from Mr. 

 Wliitley Stokes, and pubKshed in the "ReTue Celtique" for Feb- 

 ruary, 1875, pp. 430-1) to exist in the facsimile of the Leabhar 

 na h-TJidhri, published by the Academy." 



The following is the list of alleged inaccuracies of transcription, as 

 printed in the " Eevue Celtique " : — 



1^0. 



(1) 



Iff 44 



Facs. 



ahaims^(?e 



ms. ahainm.stde 



(2) 



Ih 37 



— 



foroenici 



— ihoeniei 



(3) 



115 22 



— 



t/iodgarach 



— tondgaieiGh 



(4) 



30a 15 



— 



do 



— tic 



(5) 



375 42 



— 



necMstos 



— necmuia 



(6) 



505 1 



— 



-bod 



bad 



(7) 



51a 33 



— 



-fuitis 



— faitis 



(8) 



h 17 



— 



molbthuch 



— molbthach 



(9) 



525 11 



— 



brio 



— brie 



(10) 



535 34 



— 



ani 



— aniwi 



(11) 



58 a marg 



— 



acht 



— tor 



(12) 



ela 43 



— 



agaid 



— higatd 



(13) 



725 4 



— 



tubraite/ 



— tabraiter 



(14) 



725 33 



— 



dobi??d 



— dobmd 



(15) 



915 13 



— 



becda 



— becdu 



(16) 



I09a 11 



— 



iarthMS 



— arthws 



(17) 



1135 15 



— 



forserg 



— forseng 



(18) 



lUa 9 



— 



noriimied 



— noriiined 



(19) 



39 



— 



liasa uibnanech 



— uasauib nanech 



(20) 



121a 5 



— 



lughand 



— beith and 



Together with "two more, which," the writer adds, "I did not 

 verify, but the corrections are obvious enough " : — 



ISTo. (21) 127a 17 Facs. comallastas f m^ comallastar 



(22) 130a 5 — ecit — eoit. 



In compliance with the above reference, the Committee have care- 

 fully examined each case of alleged error, from the palseographical 



