Lawlor — Primate Ussher's Library/ before 16^1. 251 



Table of the Yolumes mentioned in First, Second, and Third Lists- 

 eontinued : — 



A 



B 



C 



D 



Press-marks of 

 volume in T.C.D. 



/DD. 3(c). 21. 



10. C. 2. 9. 



F. 3. 67. 



D. 1. 16. 





) D. 1. 16. 



F. 3. 57. 

 ' C. 2. 9. 



11. C. 5. 12. j 



M. 2. 5. 



I. 7. 6. 



T. 12. 5. 6. 



/CC. 14 (bb). 16. 

 \ M. 2. 5. 

 H. 5(e). 12. 



11a. C. 5. 19. 







T. 8. 1. 15.1 



/B. 15 (cc). 14.2 

 ( T. 8. 1. 15. 



12. D. 2. 11. 



0. 2. 10. 



D. 2. 2. 





( BB. 22 (db). 4. 



D. 2. 2. 

 ( 0. 2. 10. 



13. D. 2. 17. 





Q. 1. 17. 





(DD. 2(b). 32. 

 HH. 2. 5. 



( D(?).2. 17. 



14. D. 6. 13. 



F. 4. 55. 



B. 5. 17. 





(AA (BB).5(bb).24, 

 1 F. 4.65. 



15. D. 5. 21. 



N. 1. 69. 



D. 11. 6. 





/ BB. d. 30. 



1 N. 1. 69. 



16. D. 5. 22. 



M. 2. 26. 



D. 6. 2. 





(DD. 4(d). 10. 



D. 6. 2. 

 ( M. 2. 26. 



17. E. 1. 2. 





A. 2. 25. 



T. 1. 1. 7. 



/AA(CC). 6(f). 16. 

 ( A. 2. 25. 



18. E. 1. 3. 







T. 1. 1. 8. 



/ CC. f. 17.3 

 \ A.. 5. 12. 



^ The date gives ia D (1589) is incorrect. 



2 Next to this volume stands B. 15 (cc). 13, Tolet's Commentary on St. Luke 

 (Paris, 1600), which has the old press-mark, T. 8. 1. 14 (as in D). I have men- 

 tioned B. cc. 14, not because it seems likely to be identical with our C. 5. 19, but 

 merely because of its early press-mark, which, as we shall see, is really an argument 

 against the identification. For this reason it is not numbered in the regular series. 



3 The old press-marks in this and the preceding volume (the first and second 

 parts of the same work) show that they became parted from one another in the 

 older library with which they came to Trinity College. Taken in connexion with 

 the absence of the second from C, this points to the conclusion that whoever 

 borrowed the two volumes only returned the first, and that its companion did not 

 find its way back till after C had been compiled. In this connexion it should be 

 noticed that it was probably not yet in the Trinity College Library when the change 

 in the press-marks mentioned on p. 249 was made. For its shelf is denoted by a 



etter, not, as in the case of the first part, by a letter and a number. 



