﻿70 
  

  

  T^'unsactions. 
  — 
  Miscellaneous, 
  

   APPENDIX, 
  No. 
  1. 
  

  

  Comparison 
  of 
  the 
  Cost 
  of 
  Disposing 
  of 
  Town 
  Sewage 
  by 
  different 
  Pbooesses, 
  

   in 
  proportion 
  to 
  the 
  Annual 
  Rateable 
  Value, 
  etc., 
  1875. 
  Compiled 
  

   from 
  a 
  Table 
  given 
  in 
  the 
  Report 
  of 
  Committee 
  appointed 
  by 
  the 
  Local 
  

   Government 
  Board, 
  1875, 
  page 
  Iviii. 
  

  

  BY 
  IRBIGATION. 
  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  Peb 
  £ 
  OF 
  

  

  

  Popula- 
  

  

  Number 
  

  

  Number 
  

   of 
  

  

  Annual 
  

  

  Rateable 
  Value. 
  

  

  Namb 
  of 
  Town. 
  

  

  tion 
  

   (about; 
  

  

  of 
  

   Houses. 
  

  

  Water- 
  

   Closets. 
  

  

  Rateable 
  

   Value. 
  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  Sewage. 
  

  

  Scavenging. 
  

  

  1. 
  Banbiiry 
  . 
  . 
  

  

  

  12,000 
  

  

  3,485 
  

  

  2,485 
  

  

  £ 
  

   34,104 
  

  

  Id. 
  

  

  

  2. 
  Bedford 
  .. 
  

  

  

  18,000 
  

  

  3,500 
  

  

  3,000 
  

  

  65,000 
  

  

  Id. 
  

  

  — 
  

  

  3. 
  Blackburn. 
  . 
  

  

  

  90,000 
  

  

  16,700 
  

  

  730 
  

  

  235,127 
  

  

  8d. 
  

  

  ^^i. 
  

  

  4. 
  Cheltenham 
  

  

  

  45,000 
  

  

  8,725 
  

  

  8,500 
  

  

  217,8i9 
  

  

  id. 
  

  

  jd. 
  

  

  5. 
  Chorley 
  

  

  

  20,000 
  

  

  4,000 
  

  

  200 
  

  

  54,407 
  

  

  4id. 
  

  

  2Jd. 
  

  

  6. 
  Doncaster 
  . 
  . 
  

  

  

  20,000 
  

  

  4,300 
  

  

  — 
  

  

  68,721 
  

  

  S^d. 
  

  

  — 
  

  

  7. 
  Harrowgate 
  

  

  

  12,000 
  

  

  1,500 
  

  

  1,620 
  

  

  50,000 
  

  

  5|d. 
  

  

  — 
  

  

  8. 
  Leamington 
  

  

  

  24,700 
  

  

  4,500 
  

  

  8,370 
  

  

  113,400 
  

  

  5^d. 
  

  

  Id. 
  

  

  9. 
  Merthyr-Tydvil 
  . 
  

  

  

  55,000 
  

  

  10,778 
  

  

  8,000 
  

  

  135,000 
  

  

  7id. 
  

  

  — 
  

  

  10. 
  Eugby 
  

  

  

  8,400 
  

  

  1,700 
  

  

  1,400 
  

  

  45,000 
  

  

  l^d. 
  

  

  — 
  

  

  11. 
  Tunbridge 
  Wells 
  . 
  

  

  

  23,000 
  

  

  5,750 
  

  

  5,635 
  

  

  142,914 
  

  

  lOd. 
  

  

  — 
  

  

  12. 
  Warwick 
  .. 
  

  

  

  11,000 
  

  

  2,400 
  

  

  2,000 
  

  

  43,339 
  

  

  ^A. 
  

  

  — 
  

  

  13. 
  Wolverhampton 
  . 
  

  

  

  71,000 
  

  

  14,000 
  

  

  750 
  

  

  210,000 
  

  

  2d. 
  

  

  lid. 
  

  

  14. 
  West 
  Derby 
  

  

  

  31,000 
  

  

  — 
  

  

  3,220 
  

  

  163,000 
  

  

  4d. 
  

  

  lid. 
  

  

  BY 
  LAND 
  FILTBATION. 
  

  

  15. 
  Kendal 
  

  

  13,700 
  

  

  2,727 
  

  

  450 
  

  

  £44,600 
  

  

  4d. 
  

  

  — 
  

  

  BY 
  PRECIPITATION. 
  

  

  16. 
  Birmingham 
  

  

  350,000 
  

  

  83,420 
  

  

  8,000 
  

  

  £ 
  

   1,229,844 
  

  

  4id. 
  

  

  5fd. 
  

  

  17. 
  Bolton-le-Moors 
  . 
  . 
  

  

  93,100 
  

  

  18,249 
  

  

  758 
  

  

  311,563 
  

  

  2d. 
  

  

  lid. 
  

  

  18. 
  Leeds 
  

  

  285,000 
  

  

  57,000 
  

  

  8,000 
  

  

  945,141 
  

  

  4|d. 
  

  

  4id. 
  

  

  19. 
  Bradford 
  .. 
  

  

  173,723 
  

  

  34,000 
  

  

  4,050 
  

  

  745,671 
  

  

  3Jd. 
  

  

  2|d. 
  

  

  BY 
  THE 
  PAIL 
  SYSTEM. 
  

  

  20. 
  Hahfax 
  .. 
  

  

  68,000 
  

  

  11,218 
  

  

  2,600 
  

  

  £ 
  

  

  262,581 
  

  

  _ 
  

  

  4d. 
  

  

  21. 
  Rochdale 
  . 
  . 
  

  

  67,000 
  

  

  14,388 
  

  

  350 
  

  

  222,000 
  

  

  — 
  

  

  8fd. 
  

  

  