560 GRAY. 



As a Greek example we may cite Aischylos Agamemn. 908- 

 909 : 



Auoc To.yo;^. 



d. Indicative in the Protasis and Injunctive in the Apodosis. 



a. Present in the Protasis and Preterite in the Apodosis. 



I. The Protasis is introduced by the general 

 relative y a — .• 



vd. 3. 26 (yAv. prose and verse) : 

 yd in up) I zqni aiwi-V3rdzyciti . . . 



dat aoxta ini zh : nara . . . 



'whoso tilleth this earth, . . . then is the earth to say unto 

 him : O man . . / 



2. The Protasis is introduced by yezi. 

 ys. 44. 15 (GAv. verse): 



yezi ally a as a poi 7nat xsayehl 

 hyat lidni spada anaocaulid jamaete 

 avdis urvdtdis yd tfi niazdd dldordzd 

 kud-rd ayd kalinidi vananqni dadd. 



' if thou hast power through Asha over him to ward (him) off 

 from me, when the two hostile hosts shall come tog-ether through 

 those doctrines which thou, Mazda, dost desire to have main- 

 tained, unto which one of the twain art thou to give the victory ? ' 



e. Indicative in the Protasis and Imperative in the Apodosis. 



a. Present tense in both Clauses. 



I. The Protasis is introduced hy yeoi, yezi : 



ys. 34. 6 (GAv. verse) : 



yezi ad-d std haid-nn niazdd asd vohil inanaijhd 

 at tat mot daxstam ddtd. 



1 With regard to the uses of the Avestan Injunctive, especially where it is pre- 

 cisely equivalent to an Imperative, Subjunctive (as in this passage), Optative, or 

 even Indicative see the discussion to appear in Professor Jackson's forthcoming 

 Avesia Syntax, 



