258 WOODRUFFE-PEACOCK : CATALOGUE OF LINCOLNSHIRE PLANTS. 
I had better say here, too, that I have had no time to spare 
from other botanical work— Zhe County Herbarium, Locality Register, 
and Sibliography—at the present time more important, to make 
that minute study of specimens that the genera Rudus and Rosa 
require. All the plants sent in—a meagre lot—are not even named 
and arranged yet. The list given here is taken from the B.R.C. 
notices and Mr. F. A. Lees’ Outline Flora, with the addition of 
some notes on §, plants kindly sent me by Mr. Harry Fisher from 
his herbarium, which has now been added to the Nottingham 
Museum; and, lastly, from the specimens already in the County 
Herbarium from the Cole and Larder collections. If I have made 
any ‘double entries,’ I must plead in excuse insufficient time for 
study and the want of a proper critical aJparatus—a perfect set of 
type specimens authoritatively named, and the latest works and 
articles on these difficult genera. 
The whole of the Rev. W. Fowler’s manuscript notes on N, and 
S. plants, beginning in 1856 and coming down to this season, have 
now been added to the Locality Register. 
ROSACEA: (Continued). 
Prunus Padus L.{+ A planted alien, but growing freely from the 
bird-sown drupes in N. 
SPIREA SALICIFOLIA L. Alien, and probably planted. N.— 
Hendale Woods, 1862 ; Mr. James Britten, Vaz, 1865, p. 84- 
Spirza Ulmaria L.+ Native, and quite common. N. and S. 
Spireza Filipendula L.t Native. Same as last. 
Spirza tomentosa Willd. An escape. N.—Laughton Low 
Warren, 1880; Rev. W. Fowler, Herb. Brit. Mus. 
Rubus Idzus L.t Native. Not rare in N, and I have two 
-records for §. 
Rubus suberectus Anders.t Native. N.—Boughton Wood, 
1879; Rev. W. Fowler, Herb. Brit. Mus. S.—Skellingthorpe,T 
24-656; Rev. R. E. G. Cole. 
Rubus riage Lindl. Native. N.-—Linwood Warren, 1877 > 
Mr. F. A. Lees, Herb. Brit. Mus 
Rusus pLicatus W. & N. Ni Nae Crowle, before 1847 > 
Rev. J. K. Miller's AZS. I know the neighbourhood, but not 
this species. The three next are all found about there cer- 
tainly. It is most probable that Mr. Miller, accurate botanist 
though he was, made a mistake. I am confirmed in this 
opinion by finding in another JZS. of his the following note on 
this species :—‘Common about the turf moors, both Thorne 
and Hatfield, Yorks.’ It is not in Mr. F. A. Lees’ Mora of 
‘zs Naturalist, a rs 
