A FLORA OF GIBRALTAR AND THE NEIGHBOURHOOD Xi 
taken up by later writers on the botany of Spain, while many of 
those of Salzmann, Broussonet, and later collectors have been 
adopted. The justification for this is not apparent, unless it be 
that modern writers have included species from collectors which 
they have seen. I hesitate on my own responsibility to accept 
precisely defined, so th ‘ 
the Rock. Tournefort also published no list for the surrounding 
Salvia bullata, and Narcissus viridiflorus, while Gaudichaud, who 
gives such an interesting list of Rock plants, did not visit the 
Lists of plants collected by the following exist :— 
list of Masson’s plants in the National Herbarium 
on Martius’s list contains 192 species, at least twenty-five of 
which are improbable or wanting in confirmation. This large 
the Appendix to this work. : 
Schott’s list, which he heads “plants collected,” contains 
names of species only known for the Rock, as well as some 
only known for the neighbourhood, so there is some douht as to 
which they should be referred to. Tt contains 150 species, with 
about the same number of doubtful records as that of Von 
Martius, to which the same remarks apply. 
Salzmann only names five species, of which only Ononis 
hispida, for which he may have mistaken O. Cossoniana, 18 
here. 
Willkomm and Boissier published lists of some of the plants 
they saw in their travels in the works already referred to. These 
are all taken up in the present Flora. - ae 
Kelaart’s list in Flora Calpensis contains, as already explained, 
species which occur beyond our limits; those w ich are uncon- 
rmed for our region are shown in the A pendix to this work. 
Dasoi, who collected in 1887, submitted his plants to Gandoger 
e result i i 
: ny 
probable names. Moreover, there is no knowledge of the extent 
Flora. 
much more trustworthy list of Reverchon’s finds, mostly 
about Algeciras in 1887, is published by Rouy in the same 
Volume (p. 434). Fritze, Winkler, Nilsson and Hackel also found 
B 
