NORTH AMERICAN SPECIES OF CHEILANTHES., 148 
gandie sunt. Ita dilabitur primaria, vel potius quidem sola nota 
ica; nec, profecto, a speciebus multis e e Aspidiorum 
nudisororum a variis auctoribus inter Phegopterides collocatis, habitu 
ON THE SYNONYMY OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SPECIES 
OF CHEILANTHES. 
By J. G. Baxer, F.L.S. 
. Ea through Mr. Watt’s notes on this matter, p. 47, with 
Be io result. (It will be rh that he does not raise any 
: — to the limitation or alliance of the species, but simply 
a8 to hs names pee three plants admitted alike by Eaton, himself, 
and erat should be 
es ore (Index Filicum, p. 245) states that Michaux’s 
Oheideyt applies in part to Mr. Watt’s third species, and calls that 
he nr uanoea, Moore. We have no type of Michaux’s plant at 
0] Wa “vag the —— plant /anosa we must therefore write 
the “see a name rests upon the point of whether 
te ate Stat States Bradburii be really identical with the plant de- 
— by Link from the Berlin garden under the name of 
a. Kunze Sdontified the two, and I have accepted the identi- 
authority without ever having had a chance of veri- 
lomentoan authentic — on my own account. Of Nothochlena 
of — I know nothing except that it stands as a 
untry in Desvaux’s Catalogue of 1827. We have 
‘ey Ma 
gu Maen ins Fil. Hort. Bot, Lips., 80; — lib. Vighia 13, ae 
Teal. Ps seat jap. in Mig. Ann. Mus. Bot , 221; Hook. fil. Hi 
Qi ypolentiem nee Szisebach FL. Fl Br. W. Ind, 667; Kuhn Fil, Afric., mta0, 
Senta e similem Calymmodonti dignitatem invita’ 
Peace Seon te 5 de ae cpm’ 
