154 . NOTE ON SOME INDIAN DIPTEROCARPER. 
tangular and not circular, and I have hence placed it in my section — 
Angulati though it is not a typical representative of it by any means. 
D. hirtus, Vesque, is anticipated by D. ecrinitus, Dyer, Flor. 
Brit. Ind., i., 296. . 
NOTE ON SOME INDIAN DIPTEROCARPEA. 
By W. T. Tuisetton Dyex, M.A., B. Sc., F.LS. 
I may take this opportunity of making some corrections in my 
enumeration of the Indian Dipterocarpea, in the second part of the 
Beddome, I believe to be identical with Hopea longifolia, Dyer (Flor. 
Brit. Ind., i., 309), which I had founded on a plant of Col. Beddome’s, 
i 
could possibly separate this plant from that genus. Indeed, Col. 
‘Beddome remarks (Flor. Sylv., p. ccxxxvii.): ‘ When in flower only it 
is scarcely distinguishable from the long-leaved variety of Hope 
parviflora, which grows in the same localities.” The fruit is, how- 
Pachynocarpus and Vatica, but to which I refrained from giving § 
name. (Flor. Brit. Ind., i., 317. 
: set * canciptee has also anticipated the publication of ie 
acophiwa, Dyer, which is identical with Hopea malabarica : 
(Ic. Pl. Ind. Or, t. 185. ee ee : 
from Malacca in both the flowering and fruiting 548% 
collected by Maingay, has only lately come into my hands, and 
proves to be identical with an indeterminate plant, from Penané, 
9018 in the Wallichian Herbarium. As it is apparently undescri)* 
I give a diagnosis, t is aberrant in the character of its fruit, 
however, the agreement cea 
, : ases; Balanocarpus agrees 10 eV : 
except fruit with Hopea, while Maatgayis plant is in everything 
Vatica (Isavxts) CH lis strictis ad 
1, Dyer. Arbor, ramus geen 
angulum 309 divergentibus, Srctibns; brunneis, verruculis albis sa 
spersis, glaberrimis ; foliis ovatis, obtusiusculis, firmis, utrinq4e Pod 
; en 
Penang, Wall. Cat., 9018. — Mal 
ang, . Cat. : acca, Maingay, 201. ‘ 
2 on 3 ‘al . . . . 1 . 
Capsula 3 poll. hile ycis fructiferi lobi auc 
