BOTANICAL NEWS. __ 255 
and averaging pails those in which the variation of the forms 
is so grea they are ranked as ‘‘ sub-species,” and those of which 
only “ aac ’ are recognised, we get the following results :— 
pee Average. 
92 Divided into ap et . ; . ‘ 
20 varieties ‘ : ¢ 7°64 
854 Not variable : " ‘ ; tea 4 6°76 
Botanical Retws. 
ARTICLES IN JOURNALS. 
Annales des Se. Nat. (ser 5, t. xix.,n. 4&5. February).—J. d 
Saldanha da Gama, ‘‘On some trees employed in nS. Brazilian Ladustiy.” 
Ain ‘On the Vegetable Cell ; 2, Sporangia of Marattiacee ” 
>. . 11-13).—E. Fournier, ‘‘ On the Geographical Distribution of the 
erns of Now Caledonia.”—J. Vesque, ‘‘On Crystals of Calcium 
Oxalate in Plants and their eae OF a ca "—E, Bornet, 
“Second note on the Gonidia of Lichen 
seat 
8S. Winteri, n 
Monthly Hiirese. scones we: aterm Mf Sphagnum Jimbria- 
tum, Wils. ; S. strict m, Lindb.” (tab. 65, 
Ocsterr. t. Zeits haa .—J. Kerner, “ Hyportum m elegans, Stephan.” 
—Id., “ Botanical Wes "Td, ** Distribution of Hungarian plants” 
(contd.), —L. Treuinfels, Cirsium eng © —J. Dede Bik *¢ Botani- 
| 
: 
| 
E 
; 
Flora Cela 
oo Bude? ” X (orate) —H_ Miiller. * Roark and rae of Mos sses,”” 
species). Dippel, ‘‘ On Structure of Cell-wall fin Pinus sylvestre: fo 
Kin ** Rema tks 0 n Alleged Constituents of Chlorop hyll. 
7 Ww s 
ot, Zeitung.—H. Solms-Laubach, “On the Structure of the 
Sect | Rafflesiacee and Hydnoracee” hoped —H. Conwentz, 
3 the action of Camphor and similar powerful Agents on the 
_ “ule of Plant-cells.” 
