132 ADDITIONS TO THE BRITISH LICHEN-FLORA. 
uner ; Hanau, Clemencon ; St. Petersburg, Meinshausen 
pauuh ainag Rakes, Ahlberg (approaches R. Friesiz). It has been 
recorded also on sre authority from Berlin, Bohemia, and 
Volhynia, and Ten s Naples as a_ localit R. Friesii is 
common throughout ‘the British Islands, and I have seen typical speci- 
mens from —. Switzerland, Belgium, Prussia, Sweden, Spain, 
and the Tyr 
The Lapetacid Docks being frequently i in descriptive works—as 
Meissner’s monograph an Hooker’s and Bentham 
perhaps from hecessity that Meissner has been forced to keep them as 
arate species. It would require a profound study of this most 
nd 
any more Dratatl parentage. The whole question of the alleged fre- 
<sclogaries eulture, without which we can searcely hope to come 
to ny. gua dae: arrangement of the numerous epic forms it 
contai 
Description or Tas. 131.—Rumex sylvestris, Wallr, ; root-leaf and portion 
of stem and flowering aa from specimens c collected by the Thames in 
Surrey, by the Hon. J. L. Warren in 1872, Fig. 1. Outer perianth phe rg ; 
2. ¥e"' perianth segment; 3. Enlarged perianth wit ae ag fruit ; 
Nut Outline of one face of nut, Cs, - Neteaes 5a. The sg; 
Priest, ‘Gr & Godr.) All the details x 
ADDITIONS TO THE BRITISH LICHEN-FLORA. 
By tur Rev. J. M. Cromere, F.L.S. ann GS. 
No. III. 
_ Tus publication of Leighton’s British Lichen-Flora has 
necessarily interrupted the continuity of these papers. Taking it 
therefore asa fresh starting-point, there now fall 
the following species and varieties as additions to the list of our 
British Lichens. Several of them, as usual, are new species, and others 
- their rarity are very interesting :— 
. Collema pty Sew (Del.), Scher. Spic., p. 544. On stones of 
salt near High Inn, Teesdale, Durham (Mudd), fide Arnold. 
in Flora, corse also on Releureois riche near Kend " 
land (Martindal e). r Kendal, Westmore 
SS SER ae ee Oi, Pee ree ae el Pree ie 
Tee Bes 2 
RAGE een 
NES SD eck Se eh eA ak 
a 
gen 
