88 THE JOURNAL OF BOTANY 
hk prphsrrcsion ae E. Seaford, Standen, 1912! Apparently 
this, but very w 
g. FASCICULATU J. Muell. W. Hentield and Albourne, 
C. C. B.as “BR. seisbihainvs var. purpureus.’ 
R. coryuirouius Sm., sp. coll. Fairly common. W. “ Fre- 
quent,” W.! Fittleworth to Pulborough, 1914. 
a. SUBLUSTRIS Lees. W. Albourne and Newtimber, Borrer 
(teste C. C. B.). Rock Common, 1904, H.! Blackdown (near 
Haslemere). oS prea. Coates. Heyshott. Mid- 
hurst. Fittleworth. Hastings, C. C. B.! (Cambridge Rubus 
hb. !). Lindfield, sec ier Bock; ll. St. Leonards-on-Sea. 
Var. CONJUNGENS Bab. (cyclophyllus Lindeb. Lond, Cat. ed. x.). 
W. Graffham, “both on the gault and on the chalk,” M.! 
Midhurst Common. BE. Withyham, 1904, S.! and Waddell! 
Westmeston ; Poynings, H.! 
a BALFOURIANUS “oe Ww. Hedge close to Rudgwick Church- 
W.! EE. Turner’s Hill, Britton! Hartfield, Waddell! 
Lindfield, Standen! tose Chailey Station and Winchfield, H. ! 
Hurstmonceaux, Druce ! 
R. castus Linn. W. Rogate, 1900. Sutton. Singleton. 
Petworth Station. Wick. Lyminster. E. Seaford, Standen! 
Uckfield, F.! Hailsham to Hempstead, &c., B.! hill. 
R. czstus X 1pzus. W. Downs, Madehurst to Bignor, MV. 
R. ee x RUSTICANUS. W. Fittleworth to Petworth. 
t close this article (which is certainly far from ex- 
haustive) without a grateful acknowledgment of help received in 
ts preparation from the many correspondents mentioned in it, 
itd especially from my = Rev. E. 8. Marshall and Messrs. 
Cumming, Salmon, and Whi 
LEPIDOZIA SYLVATICA IN BRITAIN. 
By W. E. NicHonson. 
r some time thought that Lepidozia sylvatica Evans, 
Meet is abundant in the United States, and has been recorded 
range of localities, from France and Belgium to 
Boheiila on the Continent, should occur in Britain; but as all’ 
the British material which had come to my notice was either 
completely sterile or had only imperfectly developed female 
flowers, it seemed safer to refer it to DL. trichoclados K. Mill., 
which was already recognized as a British plant. 
However, a further search in a locality which, from the account 
of the species in Europe recently given by Dr. Miiller (K. Mill. 
Rabh. t. Fl. Muse. ep: P: fey seemed most sely to pro- 
duce L. ssloation: resulted in the discovery of a few rather old, 
but otherwise perfect peri ced whish place the identification of 
the plants bearing them as L. sylvatica beyond dispute. 
For the convenience of those using Macvicar’s Students’ 
