NOTES ON ABBOT’S HERBARIUM. 73 
A d. ii. p. 1001), and as quite 
distinct from S. rubra. The variety as of S. grandiflora seems to 
be altogether imaginary, but the specimen of Buddle may go far 
towards clearing up this obscure plant. 
Carex distans. C. binervis, Sm. 
C. montana. This seems to be C. pilulifera, L. 
C. panicea. C. remota, L. 
There were also specimens, correctly named, of the following :— 
+ pulrcaris, sylvatica 
C. pilulifera, C. strigosa, 
C. pallescens, . riparia, 
C. precox, . hirta, 
And of some others which are not in the Flora. 
. ng 2 
C. recurva. C. flacca, Schreb., Spic. Fl. Lips. app. n. 699. C. 
C, Tiree. C. rostrata, Stokes (With. Arr. ed. ii. 1059). C. 
ampullacea, Good. I cannot see why Stokes’ name should 
neglected in favour of the later one of Goodenough. The sam 
locality is referred to by both authors, and the earlier description 
is unmistakable. : 
The other Carices mentioned in the ‘ Flora Bedfordiensis ’ are 
either not represented in the herbarium or are in quite an indeter- 
& & 
Hudson at age 680, under Prunus avium and insititia, it 2 quite 
7 Oo 
work of Hudson, which indeed is quoted on several oc 
addition to the names given above, and omitting those which are 
generally accepted, at least in this country, and a few others such 
L 
