150 
ON A NEW CHINESE SENECIO. 
By Henry Frietcuer Hance, Pu.D., F.L.S., ere. 
Tue enormous extent of the genus Senecio, which now com- 
arke,* the latter by my friend M. Maximowicz,t 
and by Messrs. Franchet and Savatier.t The plant of which I 
second Kashmir species, which usually has a similar pappus, but, 
according to Maximowicz,** it i 
epappose. There 1s an Indian species, Senecio belgaumensis, agreeing 
with our plant in the entire want of pappus, which Mr. Clarke 
places under a separate section, Madacarpus, but I do not think 
* Composite indice, 177 sqq. 
+ Mél. biolog. Acad. St. Pétersb. viii, 19 8q., ix. 292 sqq. 
{ Enum. pl. Japon. i. 246 sqq.- 
§ Sieb. & Zuce. Fl. Jap. tt. 35, 36, 
|| The Carpathian plant is considered distinct from the Polish one by Schott, 
Bane & Kotschy (Analecta bot. 5.) 
‘Young Japan’ in western science, of which a second 
face and a separate English index, was published in 1874. In this edition the 
Latin generic and specific names are printed on each plate, 
$} Gen. plant. ii. 449, 
