NOTES ON NORFOLK PLANTS. 359 
1881. a 7” C. Watson considered this should be verified in 
many countie 
* Statice pee G. E. Smith.—Cley, Prof. Prabington; Mr. H. 
C. Watson. Braneaster, Herb. Glasspoole! Holkham ; Holme-by- 
the-Sca. It is curious that both Rev. K. Trimmer and Mr. Geldart 
omit this plan 
Chenopodium steht Smith,‘ W.,” in Mr. Geldart’s list, is 
an error ; the plant of Hunstanton is pseudo- -botryoides of Watson. 
Rune pve es Auct.—R. Friesii is the only form I have 
gathered 
Polygonum aviculare, L., var.—A remarkable plant, looking very 
much like maritimum, was gathered by Mr. H. G. Glasspoole at 
Brunda 
Potamogeton plantagineus, Du Croz.—Ormsby, Mr. Glasspoole ! 
Broome Fen ! 
2; Per. ‘ce cieed L.—* Thetford, Mr. Salmo 
usifolius, Mert. & Koch.—Mr. Geldext gives this for all 
his tai but Mr. ba ct doubted it; it is certainly rare in the 
county, and I know from two localities only; Caistor, near 
Let ae and ‘“ Hidiicses Dam,” . K. Trimmer in Herb. 
Brit. M 8.1 
Ft marines Schrad._-Much more abundant than obtusifolius. 
Perhaps Mr. Ge ldart included this under obtusifolius, as he doe 
not notice mucronatus, although many localities are given by 
Re ir 
P. flabellatus, Bab.—In the river at uses ham 
Orchis inearnata, L.—Near Filby. 
*Epipactis ovalis, Bab. ae a fir plantation, Docking, from a 
correspondent: Miss Be ll sp.”—Mr. H.G. Watson. Mr. Watson, 
in answer to enquiries soit this plant, remarks: ‘‘ Of course so 
long back (forty porsche it was sent and received as latifolia. The 
only other name the plant had in England about this date was 
the misnomer of H. rubra, given to it in Yorkshire, and intending 
what is now known as Cephalanthera rubra,” Noy. 9th, 1880. This 
is a remarkable instance of distribution. In his Flora the Rev. K. 
Trimmer, under Hpipactis latifolia, gives the station of—‘‘ In a 
plantation near Hyde Park, Docking.” Can this refer to the same 
lant ? 
2 [Poly Lager flan All.—Should be expunged. ‘Never 
= nd in Eng. Flora. No doubt the record “ near Yar- 
outh, F. 2. mor roted ‘by ae refers to Suffolk, and to the 
aad station, “Lily Pi radwell,” but the species there was 
P. multiflora—see Turner ‘ aan: Bot. Guide, p. 548, &e. 
* Alisma ranunculoides, L., var. repens, 
eipicsmes should iikely be referred here. I have only seen | 
rdi 
Ger 
Sera triqueter, L. _-Almost certainly an error—see Turner & 
-] 
Dillwyu’s ‘ Botanist’s Guide,’ p. 421 
