III. FILIPINO TYPES : EAUIAL ANATOMY IN TAYTAY. 



415 



and it is a not unusual Filipino tyi^e. It is nearly related to the 

 remains of the earliest paleolithic man (Homo Heidelbergensis — Homo 

 Mousteriensis) recently discovered in Europe, if indeed it is not exactly 

 the same form (15). 



The upper lip is broad from its border to the nasal spine, a distance 

 of 2.7 centimeters, although broader lips are seen. The peculiarity is 

 in the rounded contour between the nasal spine and lip margin as seen 

 in profile. The facial angle 70° — glabella, nasal spine, external auditory 

 meatus — is not greater nor less than many others, although it is 7° to 8° 

 less than that of the Igorots nieasured in the same way. Nevertheless, 

 about 30 per cent of the Igorots have the same index and 4 per cent 

 an index less than 70°. The nasal index is 73.68, the cei^halic index 

 is 103.3, and the stature is 156.8. The head height is 13.5 centimeters. 

 The ear is similar to the odd type previously described. The physical 

 charact.irs of this man resemble those of the Taytayan Cro-Magnon, but 

 the stature is much less and other factors as well differentiate the two. 

 The sagittal head outline is of sufBcient interest to be given (fig. 13) . It 

 is low, long, and somewhat fiat over the lambda. The forehead is not 

 high, and the glabella is prominent. The occipital region is full but not 

 projecting, although the occipital circumference is 3 centimeters greater 

 than that of the forehead. The outline might very well represent an 

 Iberian and Primitive combined. 



Another man of similar form is represented by Serial No. 103, Clinical 

 No. 616, and although the stature of this man is 12 centimeters gi'eater 

 than that of the other there is a similarity in many respects that associates 

 the two forms. Both of these men belong rather to the Cro-Magnon 

 than to the Australoid group because of greater stature, straight nose, 

 wide, long face and proininent occipital region, but they also j»artake 

 of the Australoid characters. 



They are not secondary Australoids, however, which are represented 

 by two other men whose photographs were obtained without difficulty. 

 (Plates I, XVI, and XVII.) These two men show evidences of recent 

 Iberian mixture, but retain the Australoid characters to some extent. 



Character. 



Maxi- 

 mum. 



Stature 



Absolute lower leg length.. 

 Absolute upper leg length . 

 Absolute forearm leneth __. 

 Absolute upper arm length 



Omphalic index 



Cephalic index 



Nasal index 



Morphologic face index 



164.3 

 40.4 

 43.0 

 ■25.7 

 36.4 

 55.9 

 83.3 



102.2 

 93.3 



Mean. 



1.58.01 

 .S7.00 

 3S.04 

 22. GO 

 S2.ll 

 41.40 

 78.00 

 MS. 30 

 82.30 



Mini- 

 mum. 



149.5 

 33.0 

 33.3 

 19.5 

 ■29.5 

 26.2 

 72.0 

 84.0 

 70.9 



Num- 

 ber 

 of in- 

 divid- 

 uals. 



S3 

 33 

 33 

 32 

 35 

 35 



