III. FILIPINO TYPES : EACIAL ANATOMY IN TAYTAY. 429 



them or modified them. However that may be, they are sekiom seen 

 in Taytay. 



The Iiead form of the Alpine, B. B. B., and Blend, as determined by 

 the sagittal outlines, may be seen in figs. 10 and 16. The Alpine and 

 B. B. B. are almost identical, except that the Alpine is shorter and higher 

 as if it had been flattened more in the occipital region. The Blends 

 appear to be e.xaggerated Alpine ontlines exhibiting greater occipital flat- 

 tening. 



IV. EAR TYPE AND SPECIES. 



In a previous monograph on Filipino Ears (6), an attempt was made 

 to classify types of ears with concomitant morphologic types by general 

 observations in a casual manner. The present work is an extension of 

 the classification to a small number of individuals who are examined 

 closely, in which more time is given, an exact study is made, and a more 

 critical analysis of each individual's ears is possible. The result is a 

 more exact classification of the ear types and the association of these with 

 more definite types of men. 



THE PEIMITIVE EAK. 



This ear was previously named Malay, but there is now sutficient 

 evidence of its association with the Primitive and allied forms to change 

 the term Malaj^, which is an indefinite one at best, to that of Primitive, 

 which represents not only the form of the individual but the charac- 

 teristics of the ear as well. Both are infantile throughout. The descrip- 

 tion of the ear is altered somewhat from that of the Malay as follows : 



The Primitive ear is small, round and somewhat flaring, cup shaped, 

 and with depressed concha, in contrast with the everted concha of the 

 Iberian. It is intermediate in form between that of a four month foetus 

 as described by Scliwalbe(37), and the adult European as exemplified by 

 the Iberian. It is well illustrated in Plates I to V of the present work 

 and in Plate IV of the monograph on Filipino ears (6). It may also 

 be seen in Martin's work on the inland stem of the Malay Peninsula (18), 

 as in the Senoi boy of fig. 31, page 317, the Senoi boy of fig. 47, page 359, 

 the Senoi maiden of fig. 48, page 360, the Senoi of fig. 54, page 391, and 

 probably in fig. 57, page 397, and fig. 96, page 708, (although there it 

 is not so clear), in fig. 98, page 712, figs. 100 and 101, pages 717 and 719, 

 and in Tables XII and XVI, in all of whom there are Primitive char- 

 acteristics of physiognomy with Australoid heads. Other Senoi men and 

 women illustrated in the same work do not have the Primitive ear and 

 their physiognomy and other characters indicate other than Primitive 

 features. Martin's Senoi and the Australoid herein described are of the 

 same nature. Some forms partake of the Primitive except in head shape, 

 whereas other forms are not Primitive, but Iberian or ISTegrito. The 

 former are the primary Australoids, the latter the secondary Australoids. 



