106 REVISION OF THE KERGUELEN LICHENS. 
described by Tuckerman, l.c., who, unfortunstely neglecting the 
sBemningk reactions (which cannot in the present state of Lichenological 
science be wit Se alee ignored), renders his diagnoses incomplete 
and so far un 
rved t litt, ** Nomen Deooe sulphurea, Koen., respicit 
aa anced " sterilem, ramulis plus minus dengratis, 
arcticam.” Tu n also seems to imply that Veuropogon Taylort 
. Pannaria Dloglort ag sp. n. This i is evidently identical with 
eins dichroa (Tayl.). 
us Pannaria glaucella, Tuck., sp.n. = Amphidium molybdoplacum, 
Placodium bicolor, Tuck., sp.n. This is = dag 
ta Planet gelida, f. lateritia, Nyl., with which the chara of th 
gonimia in the cephalodia and the measurement of the aphies as given 
9. Urceolina Kergueliensis, Tuck., n.gen. et sp. = Lecanora Ker- 
guelensis (Tuck ). According to Nyl. in Lit., ; panatge plant is 
a Lecanora belonging to the group of L. subfusca-galactina a. 
13. Lecidea endochiora (Tayl.). As no analysis of this species is 
given by Tuckerman, ourse impo say with certainty 
to which of the three species labelled Urceolaria endochlora in Hb 
Hooker this is referable, though as Taylor no do retained a 
Lecidea subcontinua 
Lecidea ‘fusco-a tra, Ach., Fr. = Lecidea perusta, Nyl. 
Buetlia parasema (Ach.). This is probably to be referred to 
posers: myriocarp 
Of the others ianersted by Professor Tuckerman, Lecidea inundata 
(Fr.), Lecidea enteroleuca, Fr., and Verrucaria chlorotica a ) are, 
along with Lecanora Kerguelensis (Tuck.), additions to the list of the 
em secs Lichen-Flora. 
may take this opportunity also to mention that Lecanora macro- 
whihales (Tayl.), Nyl. in Flora, 1858, p. 489, noté, is in reality a 
Placopsis, of which Nylander has just favoured me with the een ine 
ampler diagnosis:—‘Thallus ambitu  sepe 
effiguratus; gonidia e syngonidiis consistant sentbeutia, que gonidia 
typical specimen for his own herbarium, we may assume that it is 
pa 
* 
