| 
| 
| 
NOTES ON SAXIFRAGA. 69 
8. _— The two references placed together under this name in 
ewensis indicate two very different plants. The datifida 
of Relates Scotch plant ’’—(Syn. Pl. Succ. 825) =, as 
well ; t has nothing to do with S. decipiens. Khrh., under 
which it is ‘leona by Engler. Don’s name is not taken up by 
Willkomm & Lange in Prodr. Fl. Hisp. 
*§. liguiata Haw. Misc. Nat. 159 (sphalm. ?) = lingulata. 
*§. marilandica Hort. ex D. Don, l.c. 885 = S. mar ey homer for 
which the ag in pei should stand as “iv,” ms 
S. mepra Gouan. This is properly retained in but 
S. media Sibth. & Smith, Fl. Greea, t. 376 (1828) Cybieh Pdiould 
stand as Sm. Fl. Gree. Prodr. 275 (1806) ) is given as if another 
as and pps to S. porophylla Bertol. On turning to this 
last we find it in italics, but referred to no other species. The 
name re all is 8. media Gouan, Illustr. 27 (1778). © 
*§, nivalis Herb. Banks ex D. Don, J. c. 883 = hieracifolia. 
S. nutans D. Don certainly = Romanzofia unalaschcensis only, not 
R. sitchensis; to which it is also referred in Ind. Kew 
S. obtusifolia D. Don, l.c. 416. This name is kept up in tn 
Kewensis and omitted by Engler. On the type-sheet Don ha 
crossed out his note, “8. pentadactylae Lapeyr. valde affinis ad 
abunde differe censeo’’; and has substituted “ S. pentadactyla 
eyr. si non it eadem certé nimis affinis.” His later opimon 
is, I think, nats correct. 
*9. pentadactyla D. Don, /.c. 419. I do not find in Herb. Banks 
the specimen from La Peyrouse cited by Don. This form of 
the name pentadactylis, sg andl — the suggestion of Sir J. E. 
Smith,” is not in the /nd 
S. petioluris should stand as 4 "Br, n Ross Voy. exlii. (1819) 
omen); Chior. Melvill. cclxxiv. ses. ” The other names 
cited by ve Jackson from ed. 2 of Ross’s Voyage will all be 
2 ae i 
S. pilosa S. virginiensis Mich. ad S. pilosa Haw. were pub- 
npr iiient 3 in the same year ats), the latter name, 
appears from Bot. Mag. sub t. 1664, being taken from 
Bolander’s MSS. in Herb. Banks. “Haworih’s preface is dated 
J stand so ried Michaux’s name is entitled to the precedence 
orded to it. Haworth (Saxifr. Enum. 8) says ‘in Scotia 
his mono ograph, and some ses es S. nivalis (cfr. Bot. 
Mag. J. c.) is to be suspecte ksian specimen of 
S. pilosa is acted by Parsh i. Aint Sev. i, 811). 
