TOWNSEND’S FLORA OF HAMPSHIRE 85 
var. geectlltars), aes intermedia Woods, 8. appressa Dumort., S. radi- 
cans Sm., S. lignosa Woods—the two last of which are perennial 
and ~ Sok scoetal. 
borus soelhalis Reut. takes the — of Das viridis—a change first 
rk, where is a note 
‘Should our plant be referred to H. pobeENS Reut. 2° rf caguie 
by ‘‘some remarks of my valued friend, Rev. W. W. Newbould.” 
The ‘*pygmezan forms” scanetie d by Mr. Thorild Wulff in tie 
Notiser* (1896) are rightly regarded by Mr. Townsend as arrested 
growths due to soil and situation, and er of caveabua fas 
the type, even as forms. The Rubi * have been entirely remodelled 
and rewritten with the personal a of Mr. Moyle Rogers 
they occupy nineteen pages. Under Ludwigia Mr. Townsend has 
overlooked Mr. Arthur Bennett’s note in this Journal for 1903, p. 103, 
in which he shows that the earliest date of the refinding of the plant 
at Petersfield was 1830 (instead of ‘‘ 1835 ?’’), and that it occurred 
there as recently as 1852 (Mr. Townsend’s date of last finding is 
1848). A more remarkable oversight is that of the list of Gilbert 
White’s Selborne plants, printed, from his own indications in a 
gopy of Hudson’s Flora Anglica, in this Journal for 1893, pp. 289- 
It must, however, be said that the author has left several un- 
in our wi as to the occurrence of Pulmonaria virginic he 
Isle of Wight. This dates from — mH prs 8 Guide 805), Wien 
the plant is localized :—‘‘ In the s of an old castle near Netley 
bey, far from any house, co agravents wild. Rev. Norton 
Nicholls. In a wood, through which the ag passes, about two 
miles and a half from Newport, I I. W. to Ride, as common as Scilla 
nutans in our woods. Mr. Griffith” (p. 814). ena (Fl. Vect. 
p. 328) thinks the “see of Wight record erroneous, and that it may 
be easily traced to the authors of the Bot. Guide inadvertently 
subjoining the then nite ages detection of P. an acpi in ue 
island, by Mr. Griffith, 1804, to their announcement of 
American species as being £43 und near Southampton”; but au 
that for the Netley sbatiel ha has ‘‘ seen specimens in 4 Banksian 
Herbarium, now in the British Museum.’ e first supposition is 
doubtless correct, but Bromfield himself has gone curiously astray 
as to the second; for the sheet in Herb. Banks bears the inscription 
“ Habt. between Ride & N ewport in the Isle of Wight in the greatest 
profusion. J. W. Griffith.” This note, however, , does not refer to 
the actual specimens on the sheet, which came from ‘“ Herb. Miller 
and were probably cultivated, but to Griffith’s memory of having 
seen the same plant in the ae ; his note is followed by another, 
in Dawson Turner’s hand, correcting the statement: “The plant in 
the places alluded to is Pulm. eae. D.T.” Mr. Townsend says: 
* MeO refers to Mr. Wulff’s paper as a see but it was ce 
‘ownsend 
originally published in the magazine cited, p ‘53-64. 
