186 THE JOURNAL OF BOTANY 
own drawing of regius. Sowerby says of his enlarged representation 
of the pores, ‘‘perceptable > he also adds, ‘tasted pleasant 
when broiled but watry rather 
112. Sisrorrema conrivens Pers. The section on the plate is 
not on the original, and a Silent is added to the lower right figure. 
118. Merunius tacrymans Fr. The plate is not much like the 
original ; the latter is more yellow in colour, with the hymenium 
more venose than porous, and the veins do not reach the margin 
of the pileus as on the plate. There is an imperfect section on the 
original. The unnatural “tears” of the plate are an addition. 
There is a beautiful and highly finished original of this in the 
Dickson-Sowerby collection, but the pores are different and much 
more natural on the original than plate. There are nine realistic 
‘tears ’’ on this drawing, and ten on the plate; none of the latter 
are in like positions with, the origin 
122. Acaricus (TRicHoLoMA) ALBELLUS On the original 
drawing of this Sowerby. has wrikteies ws ape albellus Sehivtt 99 
proliferns J Sowerby.” 
123. Agaricus (Currocyse) peatBatus Sow. A plate made up 
from outlines on two drawings, one of nineteen, the original of 
plate ; the other of seventeen specimens. There is a note, ‘‘ Forms 
circles’’; and on the back of one drawing is written, ‘‘ Ag um- 
biliferous Lin.” 
124. Acaricus (Inocysr) cropHytitus Sow. The partes of the 
left-hand figure is faintest rose-lavender in the original, not purple 
as on the plate ; the small brown figure on right of plate is lavender 
in the copy. 
(To be continued.) 
CEPHALOZIELLA LIMPRICHTII Warnst. IN BRITAIN. 
By W. E. Nicnozson. 
Wate collecting stant of spss for the purpose of 
studying the differences betwe aS and (C, diraricata last 
winter in Sussex I came upon a cons gional quantity of a species 
which I thought might belong to the latter, but on my sending some 
of this material to Mr. 8. M. Maevicar, he pia out to me that 
my plant had a paroicous inflorescence, and not agree with any 
recognized British species. He further suggested that, judging 
hepatics and sphagna of Brandenburg, my plant seemed to agree 
well with Cephaloziella Limp ‘tchtit Warnst. Herr Warnstorf has 
kindly confirmed Mr. Macvicar’s identification, stating that the 
Sussex plant, though gerreigg smaller than spe plant. adore! 
seri agrees well with it in all other respects.. As regar 
size, I find the plant ables ‘e considerable ‘vadinteon n sig 
shady places it is more robust, and produces fewer perianths, while 
in more exposed lant oe it is more slender, and perianths 
uw eely. 
