MOSQUITOS OR CULICIDAE OF NEW YORK STATE 381 



ration of the species occurring in the state and of certain larval 

 forms is also given) 



1904 Report on the Mosquito Investigation. Agr. Exp. Sta. Rep't. 



Ent. Dep't, 1903, p. 645-59 (Summarized statement of v^'ork to- 

 gether with list of species taken in the state) 

 1904 Snow, r. H. List of Diptera. Univ. Kan. Sci. Bui. 2, p.341 (List 



of Kansas Culicidae) 

 1904 Theobald, F. V. Mosquito Annoyance at Woodford (Essex) and 

 Elsewhere. 2d Rep't on Economic Zoology, p. 2-16 (Observations 

 on various mosquitos, specially Theobaldia annulata 

 Meig., with illustrations of pupa and larva of the latter 

 1904 Van Dine, D. L. Mosquitos in Hawaii. Agr. Exp. Sta. of Haw. Bui. 

 6, p.1-30 (Common Hawaiian forms, Culex pipiens,- Ste - 

 g o'm yia fasciata and S. scutellaris treated, with 

 discussion of control) 

 1904 Wesche, W. The Mouth-parts of the Nematocera and their Relation 

 to the other Families in Diptera. Roy. Micro. Soc. Jour. p.31, 33, 

 35-36 (Discussion with illustrations of the mouth parts of various 

 mosquitos) 

 1904 First General Convention to Consider the Questions Involved in Mos- 

 quito Extermination. Proc. Dec. 16, 1903, p.1-84. 

 The following is a list of the important papers : 

 Smith, J. B. How a State Appropriation May Be Spent, p. 13-15. 

 Kerr, W. C. What a Rural Community Can Do, p. 16-18. 

 Howard, L. O. The World-wide Crusade, p.19-21. 



Matheson, W. J. Does Extermination Exterminate Mosquitos? p. 21 -24. 

 Claflin, John. Remarks upon Extermination Work at Morristown, N. J., p. 24-25. 

 Bailhache, P. W. The Extermination and Exclusion of ^losquitos From Our Public 

 Institutions, p. 27-30. 

 Perry, J. C. Government Anti-Mosquito Work, p. 31-33. 

 Lederle, E. J. The Sphere of Health Departments, p.34-35. 



Berkeley, W. N. The Exactness of Proofs of Transmission of Malaria by Mos- 

 quitos, p. 35-39. 

 Miller, Spencer. The Long Distance Theory, p. 42-44. 



Whitney, Milton. Value of Reclaimed Swamp Lands for Agricultural Uses, p. 46-48. 

 Gorgas, W. C. Anti-Mosquito Work in Havana, p. 48-50. 

 Cravath, P. D. How the Law Should Aid, p. 50-51. 



Felt, E. P. New York State's Part in Mosquito Extermination, p. 52-55. 

 Beach, F. C. What the General Government Should Do, p. 55-56. 

 Weeks, H. C. Mosquito Engineering, p. 59-61. 



ADDENDUM 

 Culex abfitchii n. sp. 

 Larvae of this species were taken in some numbers at Karner 

 N. Y. in earlj' May, in association with those of C . f i t c h i i , 

 which latter they closely resemble in gcLeral form and structure 

 but may be separated therefrom by the one or two isolated pecten 

 teeth on the air tube, and by the large apical spine of the comb 

 scales being from one half to two thirds the length of the entire 

 structure [pi. 41, 48, fig. 3, 4]. This is the larva which Messrs 

 Dyar and Knab consider the normal form of Culex cantans 

 Meig. [Ent. Soc. Wash. Proc. 6:143]. This species proved dififl- 

 cult to rear, though a number of larvae were obtained. 



