56 THE JOURNAL OF BOTANY 
xample of 
e 
them, but this would end in reviewing nomenclature questions, as 
has been done so efficiently and so frequently in these pages, and in 
parting from the main business of reviewing this book. 
Enough 
thankful 
for the great reform of the Lister Monograph, has deliberately taken 
a backward step in a very important point. One is also constantly 
. 
irritated by seeing personal specific names, which are exceptionally 
numerous in the Mycetozoa, printed with small initials, as “gauterl, 
There is so much that is good, worthy to live, and utterly honest™ 
this book that criticism, such as this, becomes particularly pant 
It is many years since I have met with any natural history” 
y Edward 
s they 
ey have 
reading so fruitful and so good as the small book of Si 
They have studied their ‘‘ Myxies 
s S. 
and Miss Agnes Fry. 
have plainly studied many other groups of organisms. Th 
et an aim b i r 
bee 
5 
oO 
© 
<4 
© 
5 
et 
a= as 
® 
5 
oS 
a 
cor 
=e 
fe. 
& 
i) 
i 
oa) 
a 
35 
=} 
dQ 
=| 
wm 
Ss 
© 
=o) 
fer) 
o) 
er 
on 
=) 
ia 
‘c) 
ee 
=) 
i=) 
5B 
3 
‘* free-thinker,”’ as called himself, who thought the laws of 
ature were of a compulsory character. He was quite clear, ° 
course, from his own experiences, that 
iled to 
n you fai Ee 
he appeared to be inaccessible to the idea that laws of : 
